Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] back of the bus

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: fred burlingame <tensorpath AT gmail.com>
  • To: Arnaud Fournet <fournet.arnaud AT wanadoo.fr>
  • Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] back of the bus
  • Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:27:19 -0600

I have said before.

And I will state again.

I have no purpose being here, posting here, other than to learn biblical
hebrew language ("BH") and literature.

That being said, the masoretic text involves itself with the day to day
lives of human beings. It purports to furnish a legal code for people living
day to day. It addresses numerous minute details and politically incorrect
issues relevant to people's daily lives.

Sanitizing the meaning of BH words, phrases, verses, chapters, scrolls, from
these subjects, eviscerates the purpose of the language.

Perhaps if BH manifested as and in a book like "alice in wonderland," a nice
sanitized discussion of the language could proceed. ...

regards,

fred burlingame

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Arnaud Fournet
<fournet.arnaud AT wanadoo.fr>wrote:

>
> From: "fred burlingame" <tensorpath AT gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
> What does the language encode?
>>
>> a. literal events?
>>
>> b. abstract events?
>>
>> c. principles of law in the form of "a" and "b?"
>>
>> d. all three and multiple layers of each?
>>
>> is this what the language of, the law of, zechariah 12:12-14 encodes?
>>
>> http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4009846,00.html
>>
>> does the masoretic text enjoy the same purpose as this document?
>>
>> http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> fred burlingame
>>
>
> ***
>
> I don't know how other listees or the moderators perceive your posts and
> style,
> but I always have the feeling that your posts and questions do not mean
> what they seem to mean on the surface and that you are constantly looking
> for something else that what is stated.
> And that feeling is fairly unpleasant as far as I'm concerned.
> Besides I don't think it's possible to address [n + one million ^power m +
> so-and-so billions] theoretical and practical issues at the same time.
>
> Arnaud Fournet
> ***
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page