Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] priest code?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Paul Zellmer" <pzellmer AT sc.rr.com>
  • To: "'fred burlingame'" <tensorpath AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: 'B-Hebrew' <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] priest code?
  • Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:19:26 -0500

Fred,



Can you please, please, please explain the logic that you use to jump to your
conclusion here? You state the issue, then, without any explanation, you
state your answer as a proven matter of fact. That answer may be clear to
you, but it still looks like simply a belief statement to me. And even if it
is true (although it flies in the face of personal experience), why is it
significant?



Paul Zellmer



From: fred burlingame [mailto:tensorpath AT gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 11:50 AM
To: Paul Zellmer
Cc: B-Hebrew
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] priest code?



The issue ultimately is not whether the hand exists, but whether any
meaningful comprehension of the hand can be had in a vacuum, and absent
reference to the entire body. And the answer to that question, in the context
of the MT לשן קדש, .... is .... no. The pieces and parts of the language,
including homonyms and word play, require reference to the whole and to each
other, for meaningful understanding of the parts.







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page