Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Asher again

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Arnaud Fournet" <fournet.arnaud AT wanadoo.fr>
  • To: <JimStinehart AT aol.com>, <uzisilber AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Asher again
  • Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:52:48 +0200


----- Original Message ----- From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
To: fournet.arnaud AT wanadoo.fr ; uzisilber AT gmail.com
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Asher again


Dr. Fournet:

Based on the beginning and the end of your post, your primary attack on my view of the personal names at Genesis 14: 2 seems to be based on history, not linguistics. Unfortunately, you are completely wrong on the history here.

***
Actually, it's not really an "attack", even though I agree that my disagreement is not ambiguous. I would say that my disagreement is primarily rooted in linguistics.
I'm rather neutral as regard history.
A.
***



In the Great Syrian War in the Orontes Valley in western Syria in the mid-14th century BCE, which I see as being what the “four kings against five” is accurately reporting, the defeated league of five parties were Hurrian princelings who lived in the Orontes River Valley. They did not live in, or anywhere close to, Mitanni in eastern Syria. Indeed, one key reason why the league of five rebellious princelings was effortlessly crushed by the mighty Hittites in a men-against-boys total mismatch was precisely because Mitanni never showed up to help out its fellow Hurrian ‘brothers’! So your comments about the names of kings of Mitanni are almost entirely irrelevant.

***
Well,
Maybe you are going a bit too fast.
We do have Mitanni-Aryan names outside Mitanni during that period 1500-1200 when the Mitanni Kingdom existed.
The most parsimonious idea is to think that all Hurrians at that time were unified under the broad banner of Mitanni.
Now, we can also imagine that some Hurrians were out of the Mitanni "federation".

In all cases, the most parsimonious and the expected hypothesis would be that Hurrian people should either have regular Hurrian names or Mitanni-Aryan names.

A.
***



Let’s now examine the historical name of one of the historical members of the league of five rebellious princelings who were crushed by the Hittites in the Orontes River Valley in the mid-14th century BCE Great Syrian War. We know from Amarna Letter EA 53 the name Akizzi, the ruler of ill-fated Qatna. Here is Richard Hess’s analysis of the name Akizzi, at pp. 27-28 of “Amarna Personal Names”:

“a-ki-iz-zi…The language represented by this PN is Hurrian. A-ki-iz-zi is composed of the Hurrian verbal form, ag ‘to guide, lead,’ and the bound morpheme, -zzi.”

As to the first Hurrian word, at p. 80 of F/B we see: “*[ag-ú] [P-x] ‘to bring, to lead’
EL ag- <a-ku-u>. …UR <ag/j(u)>”

Note that this is a vintage Hurrian word, not a Sanskrit or Indo-Aryan word.
***

This cannot be a "vintage" Hurrian word.
This bound morpheme -zzi is completely un-heard-of.
Logically such a "name" should be segmented aki- # izzi and we should expect izzi to be a god: "Izzi brought him".
This does not exist. Among the hundreds of Hurrian names listed in Nuzi Person Names, none sounds like that.
A.
***



We have discussed the second element in this name, -zzi, in prior posts, noting that it is Hurrian.
***
Well
You stated it "was" Hurrian and I think I objected. I still object.
To be frank this formative does not exist in Hurrian but Nuzi Person Names lists it.
Judging from strange names like Umpizzi, i wonder if akizzi is not Kassite rather than Hurrian. The sequence -mp- is very much Kassite-looking and -zz- is much more frequent in Kassite than in Hurrian.
A.
***


The early Hebrew author of Genesis 14: 1-11 used nicknames for all 17 names and titles of the nine contending rulers at Genesis 14: 1-2. So we won’t literally see “Akizzi” at Genesis 14: 2. But an appropriate nickname would be a Hurrian common word, which is not a Sanskrit word, and which effectively means “Hurrian princeling”. That’s because the defeated members of the league of five rebelllious parties were Hurrian princelings, several of whose names are Hurrian names, and none of whose names are Sanskrit or Indo-Aryan names.

So BR%(, representing ebri-ssi in Hurrian (not Sanskrit), literally meaning “your brother”, and effectively meaning “Hurrian princeling”, is a perfect nickname used by the early Hebrew author for Akizzi of Qatna.

1. You wrote: “A general problem I see here is that during the Mitanni Period, the Hurrian-Mitanni upper-class bore Indo-Aryan sounding names.”

That’s true but irrelevant. The league of five defeated parties was composed of Hurrian princelings who were not kings of Mitanni, who did not have Indo-Aryan names, and who in several cases had vintage Hurrian names like “Akizzi”. So a Hurrian common word that effectively means “Hurrian princeling” is a perfect nickname to use for such a person at Genesis 14: 2.
***

I'm sorry, but we are moving in circles here.
These names are *not* Hurrian.
The phonology is aberrant, this type is not attested and the items themselves are not attested.
All this "vintage" Hurrian is thin air, to put it bluntly.
A.
***


2. You wrote: “[T]hese names should be Indo-Aryan sounding. So the conclusion is that these names do not refer to persons who have anything to do with Mitanni and Hurrian people.”

Akizzi is not an “Indo-Aryan sounding” name. It’s a pure Hurrian name that sounds Hurrian. So a Hurrian common word that effectively means “Hurrian princeling” is an apt nickname for Akizzi at Genesis 14: 2.

True, the four names/nicknames at Genesis 14: 2 of members of the defeated league of five rebellious parties “do not refer to persons who have anything to do with Mitanni”. That’s because that league formed in the Orontes River Valley in western Syria, far from Mitanni, and indeed was abandoned by Mitanni at crunch time.
***

"Far from Syria" ??
Hurrians were everywhere at that time. From Egypt to Anatolia to Northern Iran.
A.
***


Your further statement that the names/nicknames at Genesis 14: 2 “do not refer to…Hurrian people” relies almost solely on your assumption that the one and only Hebrew letter that could possibly be used to represent a Hurrian i would be a yod. That is simply not true, as my post showed. That choice would have been very poor for the Hurrian words “which” and “Ea”, which include both i and y in Hurrian, and for all the many Hurrian words where the first syllable consists solely of the Hurrian vowel i. The superior choice was the choice actually made by the early Hebrew author: to use an otherwise irrelevant Hebrew letter, ayin, to represent Hurrian i. On that basis, all four names at Genesis 14: 2 are Hurrian common words that effectively mean “Hurrian princeling”. BR( is ebri. [I understand that to a Hurrian, the e at the beginning of this Hurrian common word was a vowel in its own right, not merely a prosthetic. But from an early Hebrew point of view, that e would have been viewed as being in the nature of a prosthetic aleph, being there merely to facilitate the pronunciation of the true consonant B. We know that such e must be implied here, because of the )B -- eb -- discrete syllable in the related name $M)BR.] BR%( is ebri-ssi. $M)BR is $umi-ebri. And $N)B is $an-a-b. It’s so straightforward that the early Hebrew contemporary audience, though only knowing a couple of Hurrian words, could catch it. They knew that the key consonants in the Hurrian word for “lord” were BR,
***
No
lord is ebri: skeleton ?_b_r ; scheme _e_0_i (or maybe _i_0_i if you think e is not a real phoneme)
In addition the first vowel of ebri was probably long, which is one more reason it should not fall: it was stressed there.
A.
***


and that the key consonants in the Hurrian word for “brother” were $N, and that both such Hurrian words used by the Hurrian ruling class princelings in 14th century BCE Canaan effectively meant “Hurrian princeling”. That’s all the early Hebrew contemporary audience needed to know, in order to figure out that the manifestly non-west Semitic names at Genesis 14: 2 are Hurrian common words being used as apt nicknames for the five members of the defeated league of Hurrian princelings, who were crushed by the Hittites under mighty Hittite King Suppiluliuma I [Biblical “Tidal”] in the Great Syrian War in the Orontes River Valley in western Syria in the mid-14th century BCE.
***
For the time being, the indications we have are *against* these names being Hurrian.
None of them is plausibly or remotely Hurrian.
They just do not fit the mould of Hurrian phonology, of Hurrian Person names, of Hurrian words. They just do not fit.

What are the historical consequences if we consider these names to be Kassite instead of Hurrian?

Best

Arnaud Fournet
***







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page