Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] El-Paran

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
  • To: jc.bhebrew AT googlemail.com
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] El-Paran
  • Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 12:17:14 EDT


James Christian:

You wrote: “Also I don't know what your source for translation of
tereminthos is but the Vulgate quite clearly shows an understanding of
'plains of
Pharan'.”

1. The first thing that comes up on Google is this:

_Male and female in Theophrastus's botanical works_
(http://www.springerlink.com/index/H62820421HJ31825.pdf)
…practice of taking the fruit of what the Greek call the "male" palm and
... The dioecious terebinths (tereminthos and also terebinthos), having male
and ...

The scholarly article is referenced here:
_http://www.springerlink.com/content/h62820421hj31825/_
(http://www.springerlink.com/content/h62820421hj31825/)

2. It’s the same old problem that the KJV famously has at Genesis 13: 8,
where )LNY, which is a form of )LWN, is translated by KJV as “plain”. But
as Gesenius notes, and I believe most modern translators would basically
agree, )LWN is “a strong and hardy tree (from the root )WL No. 2), especially
the oak, as the ancient versions agree. Gen. 12: 6; 13: 18; 14: 13; 18:
1….”
The Blue Letter Bible sees the root as being )YL, one of whose meanings
is “mighty tree, terebinth”.

The first word in El-Paran is )YL. )LWN at Genesis 13: 8 is closely
related to both )WL and )YL, with the latter being what we see in El-Paran.
In
all cases, the basic meaning is “strong” or “great”. An oak tree is a “
strong” tree. A ram is a “strong” animal. El-Paran is a “Great Desert”.

Why the KJV and the Vulgate came up with “plain” is a bit strange.
Perhaps it’s because that as to Genesis 13: 18, the KJV translators knew that
the
city of Hebron, 20 miles south of Jerusalem, is too far south to have oak
trees. (In fact, the Patriarchs’ “Hebron” is the Aijalon Valley, which is
lined by magnificent oak trees.) Yet at least in modern English, the word “
plain” doesn’t fit the mountainous city of Hebron south of Jerusalem either.

But it’s all the same old translators’ problem. )YL or )WL or )LWN can
refer to a “big”, “strong” oak tree, but that has nothing to do with a “plain
”.

The Greek-speaking Jews of Egypt knew that the Transjordan was “well-wooded”
/Seir. So why not think of El-Paran as being the “oak trees of Pharan”?

But when you and Karl are talking about the “wilderness of Zin”, there are
no oak trees there. No matter how much climate change Karl wants to posit,
the area south of the Dead Sea that was the “wilderness of Zin” could not
have been a lush area having oak trees. If it had oak trees, it would not
be called the “wilderness of Zin”. And that goes double for the peculiar
scholarly view that El-Paran somehow means a navigable waterway, the Gulf of
Aqaba. Guys, there are no oak trees in the wilderness of Zin or at the Gulf
of Aqaba! No way. The oak trees are, rather, in the “well-wooded”
Transjordan (and, for that matter, oak trees magnificently line the Aijalon
Valley,
while not being present at the city of Hebron 20 miles south of Jerusalem).

The Patriarchal narratives have pinpoint accuracy in all of these matters
of basic topography. The Septuagint’s mistranslation of El-Paran is at least
sensible, if not accurate. But that mistranslation should not lead to
positing any “well-wooded” Seir as being south of the Dead Sea near the
wilderness of Zin, or on the desert road to the Gulf of Aqaba either. There
are no
oak trees in the wilderness of Zin or at the Gulf of Aqaba. If you want
oak trees, look north to either the Transjordan or the Aijalon Valley. The
early Hebrew author of the Patriarchal narratives knows what he’s talking
about, and he’s not talking nonsense as to basic geographical matters.

Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page