b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Randall Buth <randallbuth AT gmail.com>
- To: Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [b-hebrew] Syriac ; was BH verbal system
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:02:19 +0200
>The issue at stake is
the QATAL in Matthew 24:15 and its real force. I
take it as future and you take it as
"sujunctive." You have a point when you refer to
the Greek text where we find a subjunctive,
because the Peshitta is a translation of the New
Testament. >
Actually, as mentioned, the question is the language
system itself versus use. The Syriac is
certainly subordinate, everyone agrees. Its syntactic
status renders it marginal for claims about 'time'
constraints, or lack thereof.
English can do something similar:
"when he has done it, you will be happy."
Eng. transitive perfects normally include
'+past,+complete,+stative/cont.' components,
but can be used subordinately in a future context.
--
Randall Buth, PhD
www.biblicalulpan.org
randallbuth AT gmail.com
Biblical Language Center
Learn Easily - Progress Further - Remember for Life
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Syriac ; was BH verbal system,
Rolf Furuli, 02/01/2010
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[b-hebrew] Syriac ; was BH verbal system,
Randall Buth, 02/01/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] Syriac ; was BH verbal system, Rolf Furuli, 02/01/2010
-
[b-hebrew] Syriac ; was BH verbal system,
Randall Buth, 02/02/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] Syriac ; was BH verbal system, Rolf Furuli, 02/03/2010
-
[b-hebrew] Syriac ; was BH verbal system,
Randall Buth, 02/03/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] Syriac ; was BH verbal system, James Christian, 02/03/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.