Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] The Name "Hebron

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
  • To: davidhamuel AT sbcglobal.net, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] The Name "Hebron
  • Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:05:32 EST


David Hamuel:

To my statement “As to heth vs. aleph in initial position, some versions of
the Samaritan Pentateuch have )BRN for ‘Hebron’”, you wrote:

”Which version? MS?”

M23

Let me type out here the relevant small portions of four different entries in
HALOT. The first three show an aleph: ). The last one oddly shows an ayin:
(.

1. “XBRWN, Sam. M23 )ibron…Gn 13: 18….”

2. “XBR[W]NY, Sam. M23 )abruni…Nu 3: 27; 26: 58….”

3. “XBR, Sam. M22 )abar [as a noun]…2. charm, spell, enchantment…Dt 18:
11….”

4. “XBR,…Sam. Ben-H, (abar [showing an ayin here, not an aleph]…2.
grandson of Asher Gn 46: 17; Nu 26: 45….”

* * *

By contrast, as far as I can see, XBL in Deuteronomy as a noun, and XBL in
Exodus as a verb, is n-e-v-e-r )BL in the Samaritan Pentateuch. So if JBR
on
the Thutmosis III list demands an aleph, or (more likely) demands a word that
at times could start with an aleph, XBR and XBRN may be possibilities, but
perhaps XBL was not possible. As to )BL, which does start with an aleph, JBR
is
invariably matched by scholars to the Canaanite word )BL, meaning “pastureland
” or “meadow”, or perhaps “long, narrow field”. [HALOT gives as part of
its definition of XBL as a noun: “piece of field (to be allotted…. Area (‘a
long, narrow strip of land’)….”] But )BL used in the sense of “meadow” is
exclusively a Canaanite word, not a Biblical Hebrew word in good standing.
The
Bible only picks up )BL as a topographical noun describing places in Canaan
when )BL is part of a Canaanite geographical place name. Accordingly, XBR
may,
surprisingly enough, be the closest Biblical Hebrew equivalent as a common
noun to JBR on the Thutmosis III list. XBR could be )BR, per the Samaritan
Pentateuch, so the first letter can match to JBR. Perhaps that was not
possible
for XBL, and )BL is not a Biblical Hebrew common noun referring to the
topography of Canaan. So for lack of better alternatives, XBR may be the
closest
Biblical Hebrew equivalent there is to JBR, even though in the Bible XBR is
not
expressly used to mean “meadow”. XBL never appears in Genesis, so there are
many reasons for doubting that XBL was available as the Biblical Hebrew
equivalent of JBR on the Thutmosis III list.

Based on the Egyptian letters JBR that appear in 4 items on the mid-15th
century BCE Thutmosis III list, JBR + N could be (amongst other
possibilities)
XBRWN or )BRWN. XBRWN is in the Masoretic Text and most versions of the
Samaritan Pentateuch. )BRWN is in at least one version of the Samaritan
Pentateuch.
Egyptian J is more likely to be aleph than heth, but both are possibilities.

My theory of the case is that the southern Hebrews in their sacred scripture
consistently used initial heth in many cases where most other people in
Canaan
had long ago shifted to using initial aleph. Though the Samaritan Pentateuch
is not very accurate compared to the Masoretic Text as to substantive
content, it may be as old, if not older, than the Masoretic Text. Moreover,
the
Samaritan Pentateuch may accurately reflect common, vulgar spellings of some
Hebrew words, whereas the Jerusalem scribes assiduously insisted on
exclusively
using the old, proper spelling of all such common words. The uniformity of
spelling of common words in the Hebrew Bible militates against the Bible
representing a broad cross-section of the various spellings of west Semitic
words that
undoubtedly existed throughout Canaan, where almost every group of people had
its own patois.

Accordingly, the presence of Egyptian J in JBR is not incompatible with
viewing JBR, referencing the Aijalon Valley at item #99 on the Thutmosis III
list,
as being one linguistic basis of XBRWN/)BRWN/XBRN: the Patriarchs’ “Hebron”
in Genesis. The Samaritan Pentateuch helps us see that XBRN could be )BRN
among the northern Hebrews and the Canaanites. )BRN is )BR + N. )BR also
appears in its own right for XBR in the Samaritan Pentateuch. )BR looks an
awful
lot like JBR on the Thutmosis III list. The first two letters match
perfectly,
and Egyptian R could be either resh/R or lamed/L. )BR thus matches JBR for
all three letters. If )BR is both JBR and XBR, then we must begin to wonder
if,
outside of the Bible, XBR might have at times been used as a noun where XBL
is later exclusively used in the Masoretic Text. The consonantal sounds are
so
close, and even the meanings are related. XBR and XBL are interchangeable as
nouns at Hosea 6: 9 and I Samuel 10: 5, 10.

XBR may effectively have been the early Hebrew equivalent of JBR on the
Thutmosis III list, even though the meaning differs slightly, as opposed to
the
Biblical Hebrew treatment of XBR and XBL. Moreover, XBR has the
p-e-r-f-e-c-t
primary meaning for where Abraham sojourns, asserting that Abraham and his
descendants are eternally and divinely “bound”/XBR to southern Canaan. For
all
these reasons and more, I see the Patriarchs’ “Hebron” as being based in part
on JBR at item #99 on the Thutmosis III list. Both the Patriarchs’ “Hebron”
/XBRWN/)BRWN and such JBR item reference the Aijalon Valley, which was the
ideal locale for Abraham the classic pastoralist.

Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois

**************Need a job? Find employment help in your area.
(http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?query=employment_agencies&ncid=emlcntusyelp00000005)




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page