b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Bill Rea <bill.rea AT canterbury.ac.nz>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] OT Manuscripts
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:28:06 +1300
George wrote:
> 7. Christian numbers eclipsed Jewish numbers at an early point, and
> Christians generally read the NT documents far more than the OT. So not as
> many OT documents were around.
But also within the church those that did read the Hebrew scriptures did not
read them in Hebrew, they read them in translation, primarily Latin. In the
link below there is some relevant information, one important point is that
at the Council of Trent in 1546 the Vulgate was declared to be the only
recognised Bible for the church. This was just a statement of the situation
which prevailed at the time. So there was no tradition of copying and
studying of the Hebrew texts by the Christian Church.
http://europeanhistory.about.com/od/religionandthought/p/prvulgate.htm
Bill Rea Ph.D., ICT Services, University of Canterbury \_
E-Mail bill.rea AT canterbury.ac.nz </ New
Phone 64-3-364-2331, Fax 64-3-364-2332 /) Zealand
Unix Systems Administrator (/'
-
[b-hebrew] OT Manuscripts,
Steve Miller, 02/11/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] OT Manuscripts,
Harold Holmyard, 02/11/2009
- Re: [b-hebrew] OT Manuscripts, Yitzhak Sapir, 02/11/2009
- Re: [b-hebrew] OT Manuscripts, George Athas, 02/11/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] OT Manuscripts,
Bill Rea, 02/12/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] OT Manuscripts,
K Randolph, 02/12/2009
- Re: [b-hebrew] OT Manuscripts, George Athas, 02/12/2009
- Re: [b-hebrew] OT Manuscripts, AMK Judaica, 02/12/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] OT Manuscripts,
K Randolph, 02/12/2009
- Re: [b-hebrew] OT Manuscripts, Bill Rea, 02/15/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] OT Manuscripts,
Harold Holmyard, 02/11/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.