Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Carmel: The Town of David's Abigail

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Carmel: The Town of David's Abigail
  • Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:55:22 EST


If Abigail’s Carmel is located 7 miles southeast of Hebron, which is the
traditional and scholarly view, chapter 25 of I Samuel makes no sense. But
if
Abigail’s Carmel is located in the northeast corner of the Sorek Valley, at
or
near the traditional site of Zorah, then everything makes complete sense.

A. Traditional Scenario: Abigail’s Carmel Is 7 Miles Southeast of Hebron

1. It is impossible that the 3,000 sheep and 1,000 goats referenced at I
Samuel 25: 2 could graze 7 miles south of Hebron, in the Negev Desert. The
rugged, dry Negev Desert south of Hebron could not support a huge flock like
that.
When one looks at the first 300 Hebrew villages in the 12th century BCE,
there is no Hebrew village southeast of Hebron, because the land and climate
are
so poor there. If the land and climate were not good enough for a single
Hebrew village in the 12th century BCE, it makes no sense to think that 3,000
sheep
and 1,000 goats would graze there in the 10th century BCE.

2. If Abigail’s first husband, Nabal, was always south of Hebron, and had
his 3,000 sheep south of Hebron, then Nabal certainly would have known that
David was the rising young charismatic warlord in the area, and that Saul
rarely
ventured south of Hebron. Accordingly, there is no way that Nabal, a rich
man,
would have publicly insulted David’s men so crudely. With David’s 600 young
men south of Hebron known to be the most powerful force in the Northern Negev
Desert, no rich man pasturing 3,000 sheep in the Northern Negev Desert, south
of Hebron, which was right in the very heartland of David’s territory, would
have publicly insulted the rash young charismatic warlord David.

3. If Nabal and Nabal’s 3,000 sheep were located within a few miles of the
heartland of David’s territory, with David and his 600 young men being well
known to everyone south of Hebron, there is no way that Nabal could have been
surprised that his wife Abigail ran into David and 400 of David’s men when
Abigail, on her own motion, took provisions south of Carmel to give to
David’s men.
Nabal, a surly man, would be expected to have been angry at Abigail for
giving David’s men provisions without Nabal’s authorization, but Nabal is not
reported in the text to be angry at Abigail in the slightest. No, Nabal
appears,
rather, to be fatally shocked at the thought that David himself, together
with
400 of his men, was now operating just a few miles south of Carmel, right on
Nabal’s doorstep, as it were. Such a reaction is utterly senseless if Carmel
and Nabal’s 3,000 sheep were 7 miles south of Hebron, which everyone in all
of
Canaan knew was the heartland of David’s territory.

4. If Abigail’s Carmel was south of Hebron, then David would have gone to
Carmel himself to propose marriage to Abigail after Nabal’s death. Nabal’s
numerous male heirs inherited those 3,000 sheep and 1,000 goats. But David
would
have personally made those male heirs an offer they could not refuse. Nabal’
s male heirs would have been forced to pledge loyalty to David. Instead,
David sends a few men (referred to as “messengers”), who take Abigail and a
mere
five servants away from Carmel down to David, with David making no contact
whatsoever with Nabal’s male heirs, much less obtaining that huge flock.

We see that on the traditional, scholarly view that Carmel is located 7 miles
southeast of Hebron (based on an Arabic village named Carmel being located 7
miles southeast of Hebron in the common era), chapter 25 of I Samuel makes no
sense on any level.

Surely we can do better than that!

B. Proposed Scenario: Abigail’s Carmel Is Located in the Northeast Corner
of the Sorek Valley

The secular historical evidence from the Late Bronze Age strongly indicates
that Carmel was located on the northeast corner of the Sorek Valley.
Thutmosis
III was there in the mid-15th century BCE, and item #96 on his list reports
KRM + N, where N is the most common suffix on that list. KRM + suffix
matches
KRM + L = Carmel, where the final L in KRML is viewed as being a suffix. 100
years later, all the actions of the ruler of Ginti-Kirmil take place at
Rubutu, just a few miles north of the Sorek Valley. Many towns in the
Shephelah had
added “Ginti” or “Gath” to their town names, so Ginti-Kirmil certainly
looks like KRML/Carmel. Very importantly, the type of clay that the ruler of
Ginti-Kirmil used to write three Amarna Letter tablets is found, in Canaan,
primarily on the northern edge of the Sorek Valley.

Now we will see that the four above considerations concerning what is said in
chapter 25 of I Samuel, which made no sense at all if Carmel is located 7
miles southeast of Hebron, make perfect sense if historical Carmel is located
on
the northeast edge of the Sorek Valley, 18 miles northwest of Hebron.

1. The Sorek Valley is an ideal place for 3,000 sheep and 1,000 goats.
Nabal came from Maon, south of Hebron, but Nabal had acquired such a large
flock
that Nabal could no longer keep the flock south of Hebron, in the Negev
Desert.

2. The eastern edge of the Sorek Valley was in the heartland of Saul
territory. Nabal was confident that Saul would protect Nabal. As one of the
richest
Hebrew men, Nabal was obviously on good terms with Saul, who was the logical
person to protect Nabal’s huge flock in the northeast quadrant of the Sorek
Valley. (The Philistines did not operate quite that far east or north.
David
at that time was generally confined to the Northern Negev Desert south of
Hebron.) Indeed, it was awkward for Nabal when David’s men loudly and
publicly
proclaimed that David’s men had helped Nabal’s shepherds. In order to avoid
a
charge of disloyalty to Saul, Nabal needed to insult David’s men publicly,
which Nabal did. Nabal was so confident that Saul would protect Nabal that
Nabal
had a big feast, and got drunk, presumably with several of his other wives,
and apparently not missing the presence of Abigail, who likely was not his
main
wife #1.

3. Nabal was fatally shocked the next morning at the news that his wife
Abigail had met personally with David, and 400 of David’s young men. That
meant
that reckless David, together with the bulk of his 600 men, could operate
with
impunity in the Sorek Valley! Nabal had relied entirely on Saul’s repeated
assurances that David was a mere bandit who was on the run in the wilderness
south of Hebron, and that Saul would soon capture that nefarious bandit
David.
It was on that basis that Nabal had publicly insulted David’s men the
previous
day. Now David himself, and 400 of David’s young men, had shown up just a
few
miles south of Carmel, in the southeast corner of the Sorek Valley. The
security of Nabal’s prized flock of 3,000 sheep and 1,000 goats was now
hopelessly
compromised. Rather than being mad at his independent-minded wife, Nabal was
shocked to death at the news that David could operate in Nabal’s beloved
Sorek Valley.

4. David’s impetuous action in taking 400 of his men up into the southeast
corner of the Sorek Valley had been rash and dangerous, but he got away with
it. When Nabal died 10 days later, it was too dangerous for David himself to
go
up into the heartland of Saul’s territory in the eastern half of the Sorek
Valley, as Saul by this time would doubtless have heard the story of
Abigail’s
odd dealings with David. So David sends a few messengers up to Carmel in the
northeast corner of the Sorek Valley, totally confident that widow Abigail
will
have no better options at this point than to run to a young bandit operating
primarily in the wilderness south of Hebron. Note that David and David’s men
make no attempt whatsoever to establish an alliance with Nabal’s male heirs,
who doubtless reaffirmed to Saul their commitment to Saul.

C. The m-a-i-n point of chapter 25 of I Samuel is to show that David,
rather than merely being a young warlord operating in the wilderness south of
Hebron, was now beginning to operate much farther north, even in the Sorek
Valley
on occasion. That foreshadows that soon David will be the ruler of all the
Hebrews.

The scholarly view that chapter 25 of I Samuel is a pleasant folktale that
recounts how David came to marry a rich widow south of Hebron is wrong on all
counts. Abigail was not a rich widow. She only brought one donkey and five
personal maidservants with her, nothing else. And Carmel was not located 7
miles
south of Hebron, but rather was located on the northeast corner of the Sorek
Valley. David had made a statement of sorts up north in the Sorek Valley,
but
for the time being, the Sorek Valley was still Saul territory, and David was
still for the most part limited to hanging out in the wilderness south of
Hebron.

The Bible and the secular historical documentation of the Late Bronze Age
tell the s-a-m-e story about Abigail’s Carmel. Carmel was an historical
city
in the Late Bronze Age and the Iron Age that was located on the northeast
corner of the Sorek Valley. The fact that Arabic villagers in the common
era, 7
miles southeast of Hebron, misunderstood this Bible story and named their
tiny
village after Carmel in the common era should be given no weight. The Bible
and the secular history of the ancient world tell the same story about
historical Carmel, which was located on the northeast corner of the Sorek
Valley.

Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois

**************Inauguration '09: Get complete coverage from the nation's
capital.(http://www.aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000027)




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page