Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Carmel: The Town of David's Abigail

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Carmel: The Town of David's Abigail
  • Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:00:59 EST


1. Kenneth Griefer wrote: “Are you trying to prove that Carmel was located
in a different place or just that it existed a long time earlier than in the
story about David and Abigail?”

(a) As to time period, I see the city of Carmel in southern Canaan as being
in existence in the mid-15th century BCE, the mid-14th century BCE, and the
10th century BCE. We have already seen I Samuel refer to the city of Carmel
in
the 10th century BCE, and the Thutmosis III list apparently refer to the city
of Carmel in the mid-15th century BCE. In #2 below we will see this same
city
of Carmel play an important role in the well-documented secular history of
the mid-14th century BCE. It is my view that chapter 25 of I Samuel gives
us
accurate information about the city of Carmel.

(b) As to location, we will see that based on evidence from the Late Bronze
Age and the Iron Age, the city of Carmel is located on the northern edge of
the Sorek Valley, just south of the Aijalon Valley and west of hill country.
Professor Yigal Levin has not considered that location for Abigail’s Carmel,
because there is no Arabic village in the common era with an Arabic name of
KRML
there. There is an Arabic village in the common era 7 miles southeast of
Hebron with such name, which is the traditional site of Abigail’s Carmel.
But all
the Biblical evidence, and all of the evidence from the secular history of
the Late Bronze Age, shows the northern edge of the Sorek Valley as being the
location of Abigail’s Carmel.

2. The City of Carmel in the Mid-14th Century BCE

In considering the controversial city of Carmel in southern Canaan, as
referred to six times in the Bible (including five references in chapter 25
of I
Samuel), the following question needs to be asked. Are Carmel and
Gath-Carmel
and Ginti-Carmel and Ginti-kirmil all the same basic name for one and the
same
city?

Gath and Ginti are interchangeable as words that mean “winepress” (although,
strictly speaking, they are not linguistic equivalents). In the Bible, this
word/name comes out as “Gath”/GT. On the mid-15th century BCE Thutmosis III
list, this same word/name comes out as “Ginti”/KNT [where Egyptian K can
represent a gimel/G in Biblical Hebrew].

In the Late Bronze Age, it became trendy to add Gath/Ginti to city names,
especially for cities in the Shephelah, which apparently were trying to
market
themselves to wealthy Egypt as being in “Wine Country”. These cities were
hoping to get into the lucrative business of selling wine to Egypt, as Amurru
and
Syria did. Thus in the Bible, reflecting names created by Canaanites in the
Late Bronze Age, we see Gath (meaning “winepress”), Gath-Hepher, Gath-Rimmon
and Moresheth Gath. And on the Thutmosis III list we see KNT JSN at item
#44,
KNT at item #63 and at item #70, and KNT + JT at item #93 (discussed below).
In the Amarna Letters we see Gimtu (which likely is Biblical Gath, being Gath
of the Philistines), Ginti (which is Gintikirmil), Gintikirmil (which as we
will see in this post is the Judean town of Carmel, associated with David’s
Abigail 400 years later), Gittipadalla, and Gittirimmunima (which is probably
Biblical Gath-Rimmon), as well as Muhrastu, which may be Biblical
Moresheth-Gath.

Y. Aharoni, at pp. 434-435 and 439 of “The Land of the Bible. A Historical
Geography” (1979), discusses five different cities named Gath, plus Gittaim
and
Moresheth-Gath. One Gath is in the northern Shephelah, close to Gezer
(Gittaim, Ras Abu Humeid); this is probably item #63 on the Thutmosis III
list.
The most famous Gath is Gath of the Philistines, at Tel es-Safi in the
southern
Shephelah, which Aharoni and Anson Rainey see as being item #70 on the
Thutmosis III list. Moresheth-Gath is south of Tell es-Safi. In my own
opinion, we
are seeing how the Shephelah tried to portray itself (though perhaps not very
successfully) as being the new “Wine Country”. Interestingly, scholars
rarely venture a guess as to the identity of the Gath listed at item #93 on
the
Thutmosis III list (which I discussed in my previous post, and which as
discussed
below may be part of the name “Ginti-Kirmil”).

Since Ginti (or Gath) was such a common add-on to a city name for towns in
the Shephelah in the Late Bronze Age, it would seem natural for the
Ginti-Kirmil
in the Amarna Letters to be one and the same place as KRML/Carmel. Moreover,
everything that is said about Ginti-Kirmil in the Amarna Letters fits the
supposition that it is Carmel, just west of hill country. Abdi-Heba as the
ruler
of Jerusalem famously says that he is at war as far as Ginti-Kirmil. Amarna
Letter EA 288. It would make sense for Jerusalem to be at war as far west as
just west of hill country, near the Sorek and Aijalon Valleys. By contrast,
it would make no sense for Jerusalem to be at war as far northwest as Mt.
Carmel, 75 long miles northwest of Jerusalem, though as we will see, that
nevertheless is, believe it or not, the bizarre scholarly interpretation of
Ginti-Kirmil. We know that Gezer and Ginti-Carmel work together to get a
friendly ruler
installed at Rubutu. Amarna Letter EA 289. Since Gezer and Rubutu are
located in the Aijalon Valley, it would make sense for Ginti-Kirmil to be
Carmel,
and to be located in the Sorek Valley, just south of the Aijalon Valley, as
indicated by our previous look at item #96 on the Thutmosis III list. And
speaking of the Thutmosis III list, items #93-#96 should perhaps be read
together.
Then the first half of item #93 is Ginti (KNT), and this city name is
finished
at item #96, KRMN, so that together they are Ginti-Kirmil, or Abigail’s
Carmel. The items in between are not city names, but rather are descriptions
of the
topography near Carmel/Ginti-Kirmil. The JT at the end of item #93 is
aleph-tav/)T, a common word in Biblical Hebrew meaning “namely” or “near”.
MQR-PT
at item #94 is “water-well path” (based on common words known in Biblical
Hebrew), and (YN at item #95 is of course “fountain”. So items #93-#96, read
together, are: “Ginti-[namely, near water-well path, fountain] Carmel”. The
Egyptian scribe in Canaan was saying that there was plenty of water available
at the Ginti-Kirmil/Carmel locale, in addition to the wadi-meadow in the
Sorek
Valley that is referenced by the Canaanite word JBR/)BL/abil at item #92,
immediately before this elongated reference to Ginti-Carmel. The abundant
presence of water at Carmel was an important consideration (400 years later)
for the
3,000 sheep and 1,000 goats of Abigail’s first husband, referenced at I
Samuel 25: 2. The final editor of the Thutmosis III list in Egypt may not
have
known quite how to divide up these various Canaanite components into separate
item numbers, but read together they make perfect sense.

Note that if Abigail’s Carmel is located in the northeast quadrant of the
enticing, but defenseless, Sorek Valley, then security would have been a
major
issue in the 10th century BCE, as the enemy Philistines controlled the
western
half of the Sorek Valley (and were a constant threat to take over the entire
Sorek Valley, as far east as Keilah on the border of hill country, per I
Samuel
23: 1). Whereas if Abigail’s Carmel was safely located 7 miles southeast of
Hebron, in hill country far from the dangerous Philistines, security would be
a
minor concern. The main point of chapter 25 of I Samuel is precisely to show
that it was David’s “irregulars” who allowed rich men like Abigail’s first
husband to have access to part of the wondrous Sorek Valley:

“But one of the young men told Abigail… ‘they [David’s irregulars] were a
wall unto us both by night and by day, all the while we were with them
keeping
the sheep.’” I Samuel 25: 14, 16

The entire main point of chapter 25 of I Samuel is lost if Abigail’s Carmel
is erroneously viewed as being in a safe locale 7 miles southeast of Hebron.
Arabic names in the common era of Arabic villages should not be allowed to
trump what the Bible says.

Despite all of the evidence from the Amarna Letters, famed historian Anson
Rainey nevertheless famously declares that Ginti-Kirmil as a city in southern
Canaan did not exist! He claims that all the references in the Amarna
Letters
to Ginti-Kirmil joining with Gezer to install a friendly ruler in Rubutu in
the
Aijalon Valley are to the far-away hometown of a man who operated exclusively
in the Shephelah, but whose home base is nevertheless seen by Anson Rainey as
being 75 miles to the northwest, at Mt. Carmel:

“According to an allusion in a Jerusalem letter (EA 289: 18-20), there is a
town called Gath-carmel which belongs to Tagi and thus places him somewhere
in
the general area of Mount Carmel [!!!!], i.e. somewhere on the Plain of Acco.

That reference does not necessarily mean that Gath-carmel is the seat of Tagi’
s rule but only that Gath-carmel is one of his towns…. Gath-carmel is
certainly…near Mount Carmel.” Anson Rainey, “The Sacred Bridge” (2006), at
p. 83.

But Gath-Carmel should logically be viewed, rather, as being Abigail’s Carmel
of chapter 25 of I Samuel, on the northern edge of the Sorek Valley, instead
of incongruously being viewed as being “near Mount Carmel”. All of Tagi’s
actions reported in the Amarna Letters take place in the Aijalon Valley, just
west of hill country. The reported actions by the ruler of Gath-Carmel take
place nowhere near Mt. Carmel, but rather occur quite near the locale that
chapter 25 of I Samuel and item #96 on the Thutmosis III list indicate as
being the
locale of the Biblical city of Carmel. Note also the scientific fact that
the
clay that Tagi of Ginti-Carmel used to write his Amarna Letter tablets is
found in abundance on the northern edge of the Sorek Valley, not at Mt.
Carmel.

Chapter 25 of I Samuel, the Thutmosis III list, and the Amarna Letters all
tell the same historical story. Carmel/KRML (or Ginti-Kirmil) was a city
located on the northern edge of the Sorek Valley, near the Aijalon Valley, a
little
west of hill country, in both the Late Bronze Age and the Iron Age. Though
denied by essentially all scholars (who unfortunately choose to rely
exclusively
on the Arabic name in the common era of an Arabic village southeast of
Hebron), the objective facts from the ancient world speak for themselves.

Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois

**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De
cemailfooterNO62)




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page