b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a Spoken Language vs. Aramaic
- From: dwashbur AT nyx.net
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a Spoken Language vs. Aramaic
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:34:10 -0700
Unfortunately, I'm not in a place where I have access to the journals right
now, but this looks
vaguely familiar; I may have read it before, I don't remember for sure.
On 29 Oct 2007 at 10:06, Ken Penner wrote:
> I'm providing a reference for a question Dave asked:
>
> > Or "ephphatha" in Mark 7:34. How do you see that relating to
> > the Hebrew/Aramaic question?
>
> Isaac Rabinowitz, "ephphatha Mark 7:34 : certainly Hebrew, not Aramaic."
> Journal of Semitic Studies, 16 no 2 (1971), 151-156.
In any case, putting this reference aside, you mentioned "talitha cumi" as a
transliterated
Aramaic phrase. My actual question is, how do you see transliterated Aramaic
phrases
relating to this whole question?
Dave Washburn
Why do it right when you can do it again?
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a spoken language
, (continued)
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a spoken language, dwashbur, 10/27/2007
- Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a spoken language, George Athas, 10/28/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a spoken language, dwashbur, 10/25/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a Spoken Language vs. Aramaic, dwashbur, 10/26/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a Spoken Language vs. Aramaic, Bryant J. Williams III, 10/26/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a Spoken Language vs. Aramaic, dwashbur, 10/26/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a Spoken Language vs. Aramaic, Bryant J. Williams III, 10/27/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a Spoken Language vs. Aramaic, dwashbur, 10/27/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a Spoken Language vs. Aramaic, Ken Penner, 10/29/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew as a Spoken Language vs. Aramaic, dwashbur, 10/29/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.