Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Moses' writing? [was: The New Testament]

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: rochelle altman <willaa AT netvision.net.il>
  • To: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Moses' writing? [was: The New Testament]
  • Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:47:45 +0200

Hi, Karl,

Was ancient Israel illiterate? Or did the use of a phonetic alphabet
allow the use of basic literacy to permeate the whole society? I
always thought it was the latter.

I have me doots as to the literacy of the majority, certainly at the time of b'midbar. So do most scholars, still, they were city mice until they followed Moses. One needs free time to learn to read and write. It also depends upon whether they followed the Egyptian limited literacy tradition or the Eastern side free-man literacy tradition. The question cannot be answered.

When Moses wrote the Torah book, there were no walls to display it on.

Of course not.

And except for the copy that Joshua had made on the mountainside,
there continued to be no walls at the judicial center of the country
until Solomon, hundreds of years after Torah was written.

Exactly. Hey, these were reluctant "country" mice. The moment they had a place, they built walls and would have a place to put them. Town mice have the time to become educated, so the literacy rate in the towns would have been greater. Still can't be anwered.

So could the absence of tablets from Biblical period Jewish sources be evidence
that Jews of that period did not have that tradition?

No. too many ANE traditions are mentioned in the Tanakh. I've already pointed out one of them.
Then the older Psalms follow the ANE traditions set by Enheduanna back in the 24th BCE, so there's another one. (Cana'anite also follows the same tradition -- so no surprise that there are similarities between Cana'anite and biblical Poetry and song.)...

Even the two tablets of the treaty were made to be hidden away in a box, not
displayed publicly. And the Siloam inscription was basically workman's
graffiti.

Treaty? Oh, you mean the covenant. Covenants between a god and a person were not on public display. Covenants between a person, a god, and a third party were displayed (Zoilos is a three-party covenant). Law codes are a three party covenant. (That Hittite-Egyptian treaty was also displayed publicly -- even if precious few folks could read it.) The covenant is between Moses and God. (Just as the covenant is between Abraham and God.) After Moses shows the two tablets to prove their existence, reads the 10C to the public, they are hidden away. Joshua's mishneh of the extended version is the public display.So, here's another ANE tradition referenced in the Torah.

The Siloam inscription... Hmm, if we consider it a votive offering, (which is a covenant between a person and a god) then we would expect it to be relatively inaccessible... and the tunnel does bear comparison with a cave. Never thought about that aspect before. Thanks.

Karl W. Randolph.

Hey, Karl, please, if you want to continue this, take it off-line.

Rochelle





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page