b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Peter Kirk <peter AT qaya.org>
- To: Herman Meester <crazymulgogi AT gmail.com>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] translation v. interpretation
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:06:36 +0000
On 25/02/2006 21:16, Herman Meester wrote:
... I think modern Hebrew is about the only language left
the Bible has not been translated to!
Sadly this is far from true. According to http://www.wycliffe.org/language/statistics.htm,
*Of the 6,809 languages on earth… /(as of December 2003)/*There may be some languages with translations of the Hebrew Bible but not of the New Testament, but the implication here is that there is no translation of the Hebrew Bible into well over 90% of the world's languages.
*405* *Languages with adequate whole Bible*
*1034* *Languages with adequate New Testament*
--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/
-
[b-hebrew] translation v. interpretation,
Tna Swg, 02/24/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] translation v. interpretation,
Herman Meester, 02/25/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] translation v. interpretation, Yigal Levin, 02/25/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] translation v. interpretation, Peter Kirk, 02/28/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] translation v. interpretation,
Karl Randolph, 02/25/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] translation v. interpretation,
Yigal Levin, 02/25/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] translation v. interpretation, Herman Meester, 02/26/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] translation v. interpretation,
Yigal Levin, 02/25/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] translation v. interpretation,
Oun Kwon, 02/26/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] translation v. interpretation, Herman Meester, 02/28/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] translation v. interpretation,
Herman Meester, 02/25/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.