Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] linux hebrew fonts

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Read, James C" <K0434995 AT kingston.ac.uk>
  • To: "Gene Gardner" <g_gardner1234 AT yahoo.com>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] linux hebrew fonts
  • Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:22:04 +0100

With my SuSE distro, I think I had to place some .ttl files in the
right place but I can't remember where I got them from.
I'm working with a Slackware distro which is very hands on and has
little to no focus on GUI admin. Do you know where I can download
the .ttl fonts to get it working?


-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org on behalf of Gene Gardner
Sent: Sat 7/23/2005 5:01 AM
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [b-hebrew] linux hebrew fonts

Read, James C K0434995 at kingston.ac.uk
Fri Jul 22 21:32:07 EDT 2005

wrote:

Anybody know of any good hebrew fonts for linux?


It depends on what distros of linux you are using. If
you install ubuntu, it already has the fonts in the
package. I am not sure about redhat, mandrake, debian,
or suse.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
>From peterkirk AT qaya.org Sat Jul 23 08:37:51 2005
Return-Path: <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from pan.hu-pan.com (unknown [67.15.6.3])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46DA4C008
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:37:51 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from 213-162-124-237.peterk253.adsl.metronet.co.uk
([213.162.124.237] helo=[10.0.0.1])
by pan.hu-pan.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.51)
id 1DwJGG-0007aw-Ll; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:37:50 +0100
Message-ID: <42E23A1F.6060502 AT qaya.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:37:51 +0100
From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511
X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us, az, ru, tr, he, el, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Harold R. Holmyard III" <hholmyard AT ont.com>
References: <auto-000079297005 AT mail.link77.net>
<003701c58ea1$ac0959e0$2c664684@xp>
<480A1EBA-BE65-41AC-9F32-DD6D50B1644E AT bigpond.net.au>
<004201c58ece$d2d811b0$30664684@xp>
<42E100B6.8060700 AT qaya.org> <004001c58eda$2a611f70$11664684@xp>
<42E11E54.2060009 AT qaya.org>
<a06020402bf06e8333ebd@[205.242.61.130]>
<42E195F9.8060302 AT qaya.org>
<a06020400bf075c2966be@[205.242.61.240]>
In-Reply-To: <a06020400bf075c2966be@[205.242.61.240]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - pan.hu-pan.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.ibiblio.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - qaya.org
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Aramaic - Abba
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:37:51 -0000

On 23/07/2005 03:42, Harold R. Holmyard III wrote:

> ...
>
>HH: Peter, you weren't alive in the first
>century, and there may have been dialectical
>variations. ...
>

True, such as that some people when speaking Aramaic may have used the
Hebrew word for God. But it is still the Hebrew word, not the Aramaic
word, although I accept that the last word in the quotation is Aramaic.

>... Practically every
>source I've checked believes that the non-Greek
>words in Mark 15:34 are Aramaic, and that
>includes people with NT doctorates, Associated
>Press, CBS, and the Companion Bible. ...
>

Well, there is the problem! People with NT doctorates don't tend to know
more than basic Hebrew and Aramaic, and so tend to trust what they hear
from others. But who are the others they are relying on? As for the
journalists, you must be joking to cite them as authorities. But the
real point here is that you are never going to convince me on any
argument by citing modern authorities, rather than giving actual evidence.

>... The last two
>words are clearly Aramaic, ...
>

The last word is. LAMA looks to me like a perfectly good Hebrew word for
"why", although I agree that it can also be Aramaic. In fact LAMA is the
very Hebrew word used in the original of Psalm 22:2 (v.1 in English),
although to confuse matters the Hebrew is ELI not ELOHI.

>... I'm looking at Frederick
>Greenspahn's An Introduction to Aramaic, at
>chapter 3 (p. 8), and he is confident that the
>non-Greek statements in both Matthew 27:46 and
>Mark 15:34 are Aramaic (although he transcribed
>Mark 15:34 incorrectly, actually spelling "why"
>in a more Hebrew way).
>
>

Well, I accept that Greenspahn knows his Aramaic. But does he actually
explain how ELWI can be Aramaic? I suppose the Aramaic form could be
ELAY and this just might have been pronounced something like ELOY. But
this is the kind of argument I was expecting from you, rather than
citing endless authorities who simply copy from one another. And is the
long A in ELAY became omega, why are none of the other long A's in this
verse transcribed as omega?

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page