Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Regnal resume variation in Kings

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Heard, Christopher" <Christopher.Heard AT pepperdine.edu>
  • To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Regnal resume variation in Kings
  • Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:25:46 -0500

Hello all.

I've been working verse by verse through 2 Kings recently and noticed something peculiar about the regnal resumes that I've never noticed before. At the end of each king's reign, as you know, there is a reference to "the book of the annals of the kings of Israel" or "the book of the annals of the kings of Judah." (I am not sure whether "annals" is the best translation for דברי הימים, but I think that it fits.)

In any event, I noticed that in most cases, the wording is in the form of a rhetorical question beginning with הלא כתובים, "are they not written ...?" (1 Kings 11:41; 14:29; 15:7, 23, 31; 16:5, 14, 20; 22:39, 46; 2 Kings 1:18; 8:23; 10:34; 12:20; 13:8, 12; 14:15, 18, 28; 15:6, 21, 36; 16:19; 20:20; 21:17, 25; 23:28; 24:5). Yet in a very few cases, the phrasing is as a declarative beginning with הנם כתובים, "behold them written!" (1 Kings 14:19; 2 Kings 15:11, 15, 26, 31).

I suppose this is more of an exegetical, form-critical, or text- critical question than a linguistic one, but does anyone on the list know of any particular reason why these five cases should depart from the "standard" (meaning "more frequently attested") formula?
--
R. Christopher Heard
Assistant Professor of Religion
Pepperdine University
Malibu, California 90263-4352
http://faculty.pepperdine.edu/cheard
http://www.iTanakh.org
http://www.semioticsandexegesis.info




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page