b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Uri Hurwitz <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
- To: Jim West <jwest AT highland.net>, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:25:29 -0800 (PST)
Dear Jim,
Will you please list as examples four or five of what you call " the
manifold errors"...
Uri
Jim West <jwest AT highland.net> wrote:
I recommend this:
The Oxford Illustrated History of the Bible (Oxford Illustrated Histories)
by
J.
W. Rogerson
Which will debunk the manifold errors presently floating around in terms of
the history of the Biblical text.
Best
Jim
++++++++++++++++++++
Jim West, ThD
http://web.infoave.net/~jwest Biblical Studies Resources
http://biblical-studies.blogspot.com Biblical Theology Weblog
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
>From jwest AT highland.net Wed Jan 5 12:27:47 2005
Return-Path: <jwest AT highland.net>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from SMTP01.INFOAVE.NET (smtp01.infoave.net [165.166.0.26])
by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50F64C005
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:27:47 -0500
(EST)
Received: from s1100500644.highland.net ([64.53.76.28])
by SMTP00.InfoAve.Net (PMDF V6.2-X31 #30986)
with ESMTP id <01LJ8QKW3H3G9BX892 AT SMTP00.InfoAve.Net> for
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:27:19 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:27:17 -0500
From: Jim West <jwest AT highland.net>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Review Alter's translation
In-reply-to: <41DC1FC0.1080109 AT qaya.org>
To: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
Message-id: <6.1.2.0.0.20050105122320.01b60798 AT highland.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
References: <20041228170012.298044832F AT metalab.unc.edu>
<Pine.SOL.4.58.0501050853410.11819 AT cantsl.it.canterbury.ac.nz>
<41DC11FA.6080605 AT qaya.org>
<6.1.2.0.0.20050105111635.01b58d80 AT highland.net>
<41DC1B9F.7030908 AT qaya.org>
<6.1.2.0.0.20050105115622.01b564d0 AT highland.net>
<41DC1FC0.1080109 AT qaya.org>
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:27:47 -0000
At 12:11 PM 1/5/2005, you wrote:
>Fair enough. This is the kind of process which I thought was happening. It
>is not quite paraphrase because the originals are consulted.
I'm not sure simply consulting the originals is good enough to call
something a translation. If a student of Hebrew, for instance, takes his
Hebrew Bible and his TEV and sits at his desk, writing (or typing) his own
"translation" but in reality he is simply writing out the TEV and changing
a word here or there based on his reading of the Hebrew, this can hardly be
called a "fresh translation from the original tongues". A fresh
translation from the original tongues is what Luther did while he was
trapped at the Wartburg. It's what Zwingli did in Zurich each morning of
the week (weekdays) when the "Prophezei" was in session. Its not what the
KJV guys did.
Wycliffe broke the ground- but he did it with the spade of the Vulgate!
>But it is not an independent translation either. And this is how most
>English versions have been done, except for Wycliffe's very first one.
>Ironically one of the few which was not done in this way was "The
>Message", which is described on its back cover as a "paraphrasing
>translation".
I agree.
Best
Jim
++++++++++++++++++++
Jim West, ThD
http://web.infoave.net/~jwest Biblical Studies Resources
http://biblical-studies.blogspot.com Biblical Theology Weblog
-
[b-hebrew] History of the Bible,
Jim West, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible,
Uri Hurwitz, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible,
Jim West, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible,
C. Stirling Bartholomew, 01/05/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible, Jim West, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible,
Peter Kirk, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible,
C. Stirling Bartholomew, 01/05/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible, Jim West, 01/05/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible, Peter Kirk, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible,
C. Stirling Bartholomew, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible,
C. Stirling Bartholomew, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible,
Jim West, 01/05/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible, George F Somsel, 01/05/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] History of the Bible,
Uri Hurwitz, 01/05/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.