b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
RE: [b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??
- From: "Jerry Shepherd" <jerry.shepherd AT taylor-edu.ca>
- To: "wattswestmaas" <wattswestmaas AT eircom.net>, "B-Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.Ibiblio.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:25:14 -0600
Hi Chris,
Two things. First, I don't see a niphal verb in Prov 2:22 with an
object suffix. The "sufformative" on the niphal verb in that verse
simply indicates the p/g/# of the verb itself.
Second, Weingreen is certainly right, at least in principle, that a
niphal verb should not take an object. The exception he notes is not
really an exception, because the suffix in his example is not the object
but rather the "owner" of the action. In other words, the infinitive
construct is in construct with the pronominal suffix. At least that's
the way I see it. Perhaps there are others on the list who see it or
explain it differently.
Berachot,
Jerry
Dr. Jerry E. Shepherd
Associate Professor of Old Testament
Taylor Seminary
11525 - 23 Avenue
Edmonton, AB T6J 4T3
CANADA
Office: (780)431-5250
Home: (780)434-1164
Fax: (780)436-9416
Email: Jerry.Shepherd AT taylor-edu.ca
Internet: http://www.taylor-edu.ca
-----Original Message-----
From: wattswestmaas [mailto:wattswestmaas AT eircom.net]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 2:08 PM
To: B-Hebrew
Subject: [b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??
Hallo Members of the board,
Please could someone clear up a minor confusion for me, OR a mistake on
my
part!
Weingreen (Oxford Hebrew Grammar) writes: "It will be understood that
ONLY
the active verbs can take suffixes, niphal, pual, hophal and hitpael are
passives/reflexives and cannot govern an object..." he then proceeds to
make
ONLY ONE exception (an infinitive construct, 'his being burned).
I read then prov 2:22 and discover a NIPHAL with a suffix. i then
proceed
to check in Shoshan's concordance and lo and behold -- loads more
niphals
with suffixes. gesenius also mentions prov 2:22 as being a passive
consttuction sentence.
What have I missed????
Regards, Chris - ireland.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
[b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??,
wattswestmaas, 09/10/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??, Harold R. Holmyard III, 09/10/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??,
Peter Kirk, 09/10/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??, Harold R. Holmyard III, 09/10/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??,
Harold R. Holmyard III, 09/11/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??, Peter Kirk, 09/11/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [b-hebrew] Passive/reflex verbs don't take suffixes??, Jerry Shepherd, 09/10/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.