Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - RE: [b-hebrew] Kadeshah

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Medina, Vincent" <VMedina AT cbcag.edu>
  • To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] Kadeshah
  • Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:28:20 -0500

To be precise, from Judah's perspective she was a zonah (v. 15), it was
his Canaanite friend who referred to her as a Qadeshah (v. 21).

Vince

Associate Professor
Central Bible College
3000 N. Grant Avenue
Springfield, Missouri 65803


-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of
david.kimbrough AT charter.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 10:50 AM
To: Peter Kirk; Bearpecs AT aol.com
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [b-hebrew] Kadeshah

While later traditions certainly condemns the ritual prostitutes, in
Genesis 38 Judah thinks nothing too much amiss of making use of what he
thinks is a road side *kadeshah*, who is, of course, is actually is
daughter in law Tamar. Whenever Genesis 38 was writen, the author (and
audiance) obviously did not think using the services of *kadeshah* too
taboo or the author would not have had one of the patriarchs doing so.

>
> From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
> Date: 2004/07/14 Wed AM 08:29:22 GMT
> To: Bearpecs AT aol.com
> CC: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] "Sodomite" in 2 Kings 23.7 & Homosexuality
>
> On 14/07/2004 05:04, Bearpecs AT aol.com wrote:
>
> >
> >...
> >
> >I also think it is likely that a qadesha associated with a sanctuary
may not
> >have been a "temple prostitute" in the sense of a woman who commited
sexual
> >acts for cultic, ritual reasons. I am not aware of any evidence that
ancient
> >Israel practiced ritual sex for cultic purposes -- or even
acknowledged for
> >example any sympathetic magic of human sex encouraging agricultural
> >fertility. (And if you say that all the evidence has been expurgated
from the Bible,
> >then why would the mention of qedeshot not also be expurgated?)
Rather, I
> >would suggest that a qedesha may have been a woman (presumably a
slave)
> >dedicated to the sanctuary, just as other items were dedicated to the
sanctuary.
> >Her income would then have belonged to the sanctuary. Thus, she may
have been
> >a prostitute, and a "holy" prostitute in the sense that her cost
went to the
> >upkeep of the holy sanctuary, but not a "temple prostitute" in the
classic
> >meaning of the term. (A qadesh -- whether performing homosexual or
> >heterosexual acts -- would similarly have been a sanctuary
prostitute but did not engage
> >in sex for cultic purposes.) This would be just as deplorable in
the eyes
> >of the Bible as temple prostitution, but I suggest is more
consistent with
> >what we know of the theological environment.
> >
> >
> >
> The answer to your theory is in what Yigal wrote:
>
> >In all of
> >these, it refers to something that the Bible regards negatively, some
> >forbidden practice. Since the root QD$ is usually related to things
> >"sacred", one would assume that here, too, the reference is to some
> >forbidden cultic activity.
> >
>
> Furthermore, in many of the references QADESH is linked to the
> idolatrous practices of the neighbouring nations. It is clear that, to

> the faithful Israelites who wrote the Bible books, this was something
> alien, idolatrous and detestable which had been imported into
Israelite
> religion by syncretists. Ritual sex for cultic purposes was indeed
never
> a part of normative Yahwism. But the Bible repeatedly tells us that
> non-normative pagan practices were imported into Yahwism, and
condemned
> by the biblical authors. Even without the explicit references, we
would
> expect cultic prostitution to be one of these practices. 2 Kings 23:7
is
> one of the passages in which these practices are condemned, in that
they
> were stamped out by Josiah who is commended as the ideal faithful king

> (v.25).
>
> So, although we cannot be sure exactly what a QADESH did, we cannot
> argue that it was not temple prostitution because this was not an
> Israelite practice. Israelite practice in the pre-exilic period did
not
> always match the ideals of the Deuteronomist, and the texts bear
witness
> to that in their condemnations. Indeed, at times, such as the reign of

> Manasseh, Israelite practice was much like that of the surrounding
> nations, including child sacrifice (2 Kings 21:6), and the use of the
> word QADESH in association with such periods suggests that temple
> prostitution was included.
>
>
> --
> Peter Kirk
> peter AT qaya.org (personal)
> peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
> http://www.qaya.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>

David Kimbrough
San Gabriel

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page