Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Kadeshah & Judah

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: <david.kimbrough AT charter.net>
  • To: "Medina, Vincent" <VMedina AT cbcag.edu>, <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Kadeshah & Judah
  • Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:33:56 +0000

Not quite:

Genesis 38:21 (NASB) He [Judah] asked the men of her place, saying, "Where is
the temple prostitute [kadeshah] who was by the road at Enaim?" But they
said, "There has been no temple prostitute here."


>
> From: "Medina, Vincent" <VMedina AT cbcag.edu>
> Date: 2004/07/14 Wed PM 04:28:20 GMT
> To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] Kadeshah
>
> To be precise, from Judah's perspective she was a zonah (v. 15), it was
> his Canaanite friend who referred to her as a Qadeshah (v. 21).
>
> Vince
>
> Associate Professor
> Central Bible College
> 3000 N. Grant Avenue
> Springfield, Missouri 65803
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of
> david.kimbrough AT charter.net
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 10:50 AM
> To: Peter Kirk; Bearpecs AT aol.com
> Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: [b-hebrew] Kadeshah
>
> While later traditions certainly condemns the ritual prostitutes, in
> Genesis 38 Judah thinks nothing too much amiss of making use of what he
> thinks is a road side *kadeshah*, who is, of course, is actually is
> daughter in law Tamar. Whenever Genesis 38 was writen, the author (and
> audiance) obviously did not think using the services of *kadeshah* too
> taboo or the author would not have had one of the patriarchs doing so.
>
> >
> > From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
> > Date: 2004/07/14 Wed AM 08:29:22 GMT
> > To: Bearpecs AT aol.com
> > CC: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] "Sodomite" in 2 Kings 23.7 & Homosexuality
> >
> > On 14/07/2004 05:04, Bearpecs AT aol.com wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >...
> > >
> > >I also think it is likely that a qadesha associated with a sanctuary
> may not
> > >have been a "temple prostitute" in the sense of a woman who commited
> sexual
> > >acts for cultic, ritual reasons. I am not aware of any evidence that
> ancient
> > >Israel practiced ritual sex for cultic purposes -- or even
> acknowledged for
> > >example any sympathetic magic of human sex encouraging agricultural
> > >fertility. (And if you say that all the evidence has been expurgated
> from the Bible,
> > >then why would the mention of qedeshot not also be expurgated?)
> Rather, I
> > >would suggest that a qedesha may have been a woman (presumably a
> slave)
> > >dedicated to the sanctuary, just as other items were dedicated to the
> sanctuary.
> > >Her income would then have belonged to the sanctuary. Thus, she may
> have been
> > >a prostitute, and a "holy" prostitute in the sense that her cost
> went to the
> > >upkeep of the holy sanctuary, but not a "temple prostitute" in the
> classic
> > >meaning of the term. (A qadesh -- whether performing homosexual or
> > >heterosexual acts -- would similarly have been a sanctuary
> prostitute but did not engage
> > >in sex for cultic purposes.) This would be just as deplorable in
> the eyes
> > >of the Bible as temple prostitution, but I suggest is more
> consistent with
> > >what we know of the theological environment.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > The answer to your theory is in what Yigal wrote:
> >
> > >In all of
> > >these, it refers to something that the Bible regards negatively, some
> > >forbidden practice. Since the root QD$ is usually related to things
> > >"sacred", one would assume that here, too, the reference is to some
> > >forbidden cultic activity.
> > >
> >
> > Furthermore, in many of the references QADESH is linked to the
> > idolatrous practices of the neighbouring nations. It is clear that, to
>
> > the faithful Israelites who wrote the Bible books, this was something
> > alien, idolatrous and detestable which had been imported into
> Israelite
> > religion by syncretists. Ritual sex for cultic purposes was indeed
> never
> > a part of normative Yahwism. But the Bible repeatedly tells us that
> > non-normative pagan practices were imported into Yahwism, and
> condemned
> > by the biblical authors. Even without the explicit references, we

> would
> > expect cultic prostitution to be one of these practices. 2 Kings 23:7
> is
> > one of the passages in which these practices are condemned, in that
> they
> > were stamped out by Josiah who is commended as the ideal faithful king
>
> > (v.25).
> >
> > So, although we cannot be sure exactly what a QADESH did, we cannot
> > argue that it was not temple prostitution because this was not an
> > Israelite practice. Israelite practice in the pre-exilic period did
> not
> > always match the ideals of the Deuteronomist, and the texts bear
> witness
> > to that in their condemnations. Indeed, at times, such as the reign of
>
> > Manasseh, Israelite practice was much like that of the surrounding
> > nations, including child sacrifice (2 Kings 21:6), and the use of the
> > word QADESH in association with such periods suggests that temple
> > prostitution was included.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Peter Kirk
> > peter AT qaya.org (personal)
> > peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
> > http://www.qaya.org/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > b-hebrew mailing list
> > b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
> >
>
> David Kimbrough
> San Gabriel
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>

David Kimbrough
San Gabriel




  • [b-hebrew] Kadeshah & Judah, david.kimbrough, 07/14/2004

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page