b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
[b-hebrew] Re: BH - one language? (was:Job & Sumer)
- From: "Noam Eitan" <neitian AT nyc.rr.com>
- To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [b-hebrew] Re: BH - one language? (was:Job & Sumer)
- Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:01:17 -0400
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Kirk" <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
> I see a variety of misunderstandings here, of which the most significant
> may be the assumption that the book of Job as we have it has an
> Israelite source or is even in Hebrew. Its language is certainly very
> strange by the regular standards of biblical Hebrew, and may well have
> been more strange before being tidied up by later copyists.
This can be generalized to the entire OT - written and edited (by some
estimates) over more than a millennium, it is hardly written in one language
(Aramaic aside.) I have been able to decipher the few Ugaritic lines that I
was exposed to with a slightly better success rate (less than half) than
much of the poetry part of Job (about a third.) This, in a collection of
writings that contains large sections (admittedly prose) that an average 9
year old Israeli kid can get through and get the plot. Noam Eitan,
Brooklyn, NY
-
[b-hebrew] Job & Sumer,
david.kimbrough, 06/10/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Job & Sumer, Harold R. Holmyard III, 06/10/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Re: Job & Sumer,
Dave Washburn, 06/10/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Re: Job & Sumer,
Harold R. Holmyard III, 06/10/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Job & Sumer, Tony Costa, 06/10/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Re: Job & Sumer,
Harold R. Holmyard III, 06/10/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[b-hebrew] Job & Sumer,
david.kimbrough, 06/10/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Job & Sumer, Dave Washburn, 06/11/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Job & Sumer,
Peter Kirk, 06/11/2004
- [b-hebrew] Re: BH - one language? (was:Job & Sumer), Noam Eitan, 06/12/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Re: Job & Sumer,
Harold R. Holmyard III, 06/11/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Re: Job & Sumer, B. M. Rocine, 06/11/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.