b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Sesamo m." <sesamox AT hotmail.com>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:34:45 +0100
Concerning Latin, the letters of Paul cannot be used as evidence against Latin
and on favour of Greek as the language of Rome and its provinces. Latin was well
alive and this fact is confirmed by its fruiets: the Romance languages that are
still spoken in the former Roman territories (Castillian, Galego, Catala,
Rumanian, Italian, Portuguese, French etc).
However, we can notice that these Romance languages are spoken in what was the Western part of the Empire (with the exception of Rumanian, that was the result of the intense collonization that followed the conquest of Dacia by Traianus). When two peoples get in contact, the language of the more prestigious culture use to prevail. When the less "civilized" peoples of the West were conquered by Rome, they didn't have a common advanced culture nor a spread and widely known lingua franca, so the Roman culture and language prevailed easily.
But the situation in the East was very different. The former Hellenistic kingdoms had a culture far more prestigious than the Roman one, and a very prestigious and widespread language that easily prevailed. In fact, when the Empire was divided, Greek was the official language of the Eastern Empire, and so was during all the existence of the Byzantine Empire.
It seems logicall that in times of Cicero, Greek was a foreign but very prestigious language in Rome. However, Cicero himself, along with many others in the next few years contributed largely to the prestige of Latin, so I can't be sure of the situation into Rome. I guess that being a cosmopolitan city, there could be a lot of people who didn't speak Latin. And Greek could easily be a lingua franca for them. That could be the case of the congregation in Rome in those early days, composed to a certain extent of Jews and other inmigrants (Aquila and Prisca, for instance).
Also, I also think that Greek would have been a better option than Latin for the film "The Passion".
Sergio (Madrid)
_________________________________________________________________
¿Todavía no conoces el nuevo MSN Messenger? Descárgatelo gratis aquí. http://messenger.microsoft.com/es
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival
, (continued)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival,
Peter Kirk, 02/24/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival, Charles David Isbell, 02/24/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival,
Harold R. Holmyard III, 02/24/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival, Peter Kirk, 02/25/2004
- [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival, Harold R. Holmyard III, 02/24/2004
- RE: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival, David Kimbrough (CLWA), 02/24/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival,
turgueman, 02/25/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival, Pere Casanellas, 02/26/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival, Peter Kirk, 02/26/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival, Polycarp66, 02/25/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival,
Sesamo m., 02/27/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] END THREAD Linguists hope for Aramaic revival, B. M. Rocine, 02/27/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival,
turgueman, 02/28/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival, Peter Kirk, 02/28/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Linguists hope for Aramaic revival,
Peter Kirk, 02/24/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.