Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Hebrew transliteration

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Trevor Peterson" <06peterson AT cua.edu>
  • To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Hebrew transliteration
  • Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:58:03 -0500

I keep coming back to the issue of transliteration, mostly because I'm not
happy with any system I've come across so far. Some of the things that bother
me are

1) the problem of representing matres lectionis in a responsible manner
2) how to represent the vowels (according to a seven-vowel system)
3) balancing representation of the written signs with readability

I like the MCW system for its precision in representing the written text and
its utility in a plain-text environment. On the other hand, it's ugly to
read. I like what the SBL manual calls the "general purpose"
system--basically what's popular in Jewish writing--for its simplicity and
readability; but it sacrifices precision.

Anyway, I'm interested in feedback on what I've come up with so far:

1) For the consonants, I basically follow the system used in JBL, CBQ, etc.
One quirk is that I prefer dotted-k to q for qof, simply because it's a more
consistent representation of the emphatics.
2) For the vowels, I do not represent length. I use seven distinct signs and
three subscripted vowels for the half-vowels. For the full vowels, I use e
for tsere, o for holem, u for kubbutz, i for hireq, and a for patah. I use
the combined ae symbol for segol and a with a circle overtop for qametz
(regardless of whether it comes from original a or u). This is basically the
system used in Saenz-Badillos. I represent half-vowels with subscripted a, e,
and o. (It might be more precise to use ae and circle-a, but that seems
needlessly complicated.) I don't represent shva at all, regardless of whether
it's so-called vocal shva or silent.
3) I represent doubling by writing the consonant doubled. Where necessary, I
represent spirantization of bgdkft letters with a horizontal stroke over or
under the letter. This is standard practice.
4) I represent matres lectionis by writing the vowel according to the
equivalences given in #2 and following it with a superscript of the mater
consonant. This shows the reader both the consonantal writing and the
Masoretic vocalization while still facilitating readability. It has the
advantage over the SBL and CBQ system that it distinguishes between, for
instance, tsere-yod, tsere-he, and segol-he.
5) I'm not sure what to do with quiescent alef and furtive patah. Right now,
my inclination is simply to write them as ' and a, respectively. Anyone who
knows Hebrew should be able to recognize where alef is quiescent without
needing it pointed out; since consonants are always written, the only way to
have a after another vowel is if the vowel is a furtive patah. I don't want
to write quiescent alef as a superscript, because it is actually the opposite
of a mater. I don't want to put either one in parenthesis, because I think
that looks ugly and is probably unnecessary.

I think that's the gist of the system. Obviously, it doesn't work very well
in a plain-text environment, although it can all be represented in a
plain-text source file for LaTeX. And that's fine for now. I've just about
given up on finding a system that I like for both plain-text e-mail and
typeset media.

Trevor Peterson
CUA/Semitics





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page