b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Karl Randolph" <kwrandolph AT email.com>
- To: "Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] question from parshat ha'azinu
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 20:34:47 -0500
Dear Trevor:
When I got a list of the verses that have the -MW suffix, I then wrote down
my initial
impressions of its uses. Your questions below give me more food for thought.
In a quick search where -MW- is used as an infix between a preceeding word
and a
personal pronoun suffix, it is always appended on K- prefix. This appears to
be used
over a hundred times. It is sometimes used where one could expect the K- to
be
prefixed to the following word possibly making it emphatic, sometimes as
stand
alone, as in "Who is like you?".
What you pointed out may change my initial response.
I'll have to get back later on further impressions.
Thanks for the feedback.
Karl W. Randolph.
Karl W. Randolph.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trevor Peterson" <06peterson AT cua.edu>
> Karl wrote:
>
> > the meaning of the suffix could either be plural or
> > singular, though usually plural it occurs more often in
> > poetry than prose, Deuteronomy 32 is poetry
>
> The frequency in poetry may not have much to do with semantics. Since it
> is poetry, we should consider the possibility that it was added for
> sound--to lengthen a form (and thus lengthen a line), perhaps. It could
> also be an archaic or dialectal feature, which tend to hold on in poetry
> longer than in prose.
>
> > it is more
> > often attached to a single letter prefix than to a noun or
> > verb e.g. KMW or LMW
>
> There could also be a connection with the longer forms from these
> single-letter prepositions (particularly K), where the -mo- appears
> before the usual suffix. If this is basically the same thing, it's one
> of the most common appearances in prose.
>
> > where it is plural, it usually refers
> > to a natural group or assemblage, such as a people, tribe
> > it seems to emphasize the subject of the -MW more so than the
> > noun or prefix its appended to it seems to indicate that
> > very subject, possibly a reflexive emphasis, not a general subject
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this last part. A possessive or object
> suffix is intended to refer to something else, rather than the word to
> which it is attached. Could you give some examples of this emphasis you
> see (and how it differs from other suffixes)?
>
> Trevor Peterson
> CUA/Semitics
--
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
CareerBuilder.com has over 400,000 jobs. Be smarter about your job search
http://corp.mail.com/careers
-
[b-hebrew] question from parshat ha'azinu,
Jason Hare, 10/04/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] question from parshat ha'azinu,
Karl Randolph, 10/04/2003
- RE: [b-hebrew] question from parshat ha'azinu, Trevor Peterson, 10/04/2003
-
RE: [b-hebrew] question from parshat ha'azinu,
Karl Randolph, 10/06/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] question from parshat ha'azinu, Jason Hare, 10/06/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] question from parshat ha'azinu, Karl Randolph, 10/07/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.