b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Polycarp66 AT aol.com
- To: ben.crick AT argonet.co.uk, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Jonah 1:2
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:14:21 EST
In a message dated 3/5/2003 3:42:31 PM Eastern Standard Time,
ben.crick AT argonet.co.uk writes:
> This weekend I am starting a series on Jonah. Immediately there is a textual
> crux in 1:2 "Arise go to Nineveh, that great city, and cry *against* it,
> for
> their wickedness is come up before me" (KJV).
>
> The LXX has ... POREUQHTI IES NINEUH THN POLIN THN MEGALHN, KAI KHRUXON *EN
> AUTHi*....
>
> The Vulgate has ... vade in Nineven civitatem grandem et praedica *en ea*
> ...
>
> The BHS has ... LeK 'eL-NiYN:WeH Ha`iYR HaGG:DoWLaH uWQ:Ra' *`aLeYHa* ...
>
> Could it be that an original Aleph has been substituted by an `ayin in the
> BHS, the scribes taking Jonah's view (4:2) that mercy should not be
> preached
> to the Ninevites, but rather Wrath be preached against it? There is no
> footnote in the App: Crit: of the BHS to this effect.
>
> I would be very grateful for any learned comments on this.
>
As you rightly note, there is a difference in meaning when )L is used rather
than (L with QR). I generally do not favor using other versions when the MT
makes perfectly good sense. In this case it would seem to be a pronouncement
of judgment if one reads with the MT which is in keeping with Dt 24.15
W:Lo)_YiQ:Rf) (fLeYKf )eL_YHWH
I think I would stick with the MT.
gfsomsel
>From cisbell AT cox.net Wed Mar 5 16:23:35 2003
Return-Path: <cisbell AT cox.net>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from lakemtao05.cox.net (lakemtao05.cox.net [68.1.17.116])
by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D153420035
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:23:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from c78279a ([68.11.135.232]) by lakemtao05.cox.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with SMTP
id <20030305212502.KQQI8513.lakemtao05.cox.net@c78279a>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:25:02 -0500
Message-ID: <003301c2e35d$a7286020$e8870b44 AT no.cox.net>
From: "Charles David Isbell" <cisbell AT cox.net>
To: "Ben and Jo Crick" <ben.crick AT argonet.co.uk>,
<b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
References: <E18qfhX-0002y0-00 AT smtp.argonet.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Jonah 1:2
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 15:24:49 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: A forum on the Hebrew Bible, its language and interpretation
<b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 21:23:35 -0000
Ben,
With 1.2, you should compare 3.2, which in fact does have the ALEF for )el.
I think this is little more than a euphonic variation rather than a serious
textual problem.
Perhaps you know of my article Why Jonah Is Read On Yom Kippur, Central
Conference of American Rabbis Journal (Summer 1998): 84-99.
Good luck with Jonah.
Charles
-
[b-hebrew] Jonah 1:2,
Ben and Jo Crick, 03/05/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] Jonah 1:2, B. M. Rocine, 03/05/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] Jonah 1:2, Raymond de Hoop, 03/05/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] Jonah 1:2, Jim West, 03/05/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] Jonah 1:2, Polycarp66, 03/05/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] Jonah 1:2, Ben and Jo Crick, 03/06/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.