b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: ben.crick AT argonet.co.uk (Ben and Jo Crick)
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: RE: joash transcription
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 22:27:56 +0000
On Sat 18 Jan 2003 (09:50:14), uhurwitz AT yahoo.com wrote:
> But to return to the Jehoash inscription: not enough attention is given
> to the physical report of the geologists. This seems crucial in the eyes
> of some epigraphers -- if the tablet is indeed ancient, can the inscription
> on it have been faked? Not according the technical reports so far.
>
How does the Jehoash tablet compare with the Siloam Tunnel inscription?
The latter seems accepted as a genuine inscription from the reign of
Hezekiah (2 Kings 20:20).
Ben
--
Revd Ben Crick BA CF, and Mrs Joanna (Goodwin) Crick
<ben.crick AT argonet.co.uk>
232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK)
http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm
-
joash transcription,
Jim West, 01/16/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: joash transcription, Ken Penner, 01/17/2003
- RE: joash transcription, B. M. Rocine, 01/17/2003
- RE: joash transcription, Jack Kilmon, 01/17/2003
- RE: joash transcription, uri hurwitz, 01/18/2003
- RE: joash transcription, Jack Kilmon, 01/18/2003
- RE: joash transcription, Ben and Jo Crick, 01/18/2003
- RE: joash transcription, Jonathan D. Safren, 01/19/2003
-
RE: joash transcription,
Jim West, 01/19/2003
- RE: joash transcription, Jonathan D. Safren, 01/19/2003
- RE: joash transcription, Schmuel, 01/19/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.