b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Trevor Peterson <06PETERSON AT cua.edu>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: Et (Genesis 1:1)
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 11:02:58 -0400
>===== Original Message From "Lisbeth S. Fried" <lizfried AT umich.edu> =====
>The et indicates the accusative only when the accusative
>is also marked by the definite "the" "he".
Just a tiny clarification--the accusative should be definite, but it doesn't
have to be marked with the determined state (definite article, he-prefix). A
proper noun, for instance, requires no such marking to be definite.
Trevor Peterson
CUA/Semitics
-
Et (Genesis 1:1),
Daniel Walin, 05/21/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Et (Genesis 1:1), Polycarp66, 05/22/2002
- Re: Et (Genesis 1:1), Dave Washburn, 05/22/2002
- RE: Et (Genesis 1:1), Lisbeth S. Fried, 05/22/2002
- RE: Et (Genesis 1:1), Trevor Peterson, 05/22/2002
- RE: Et (Genesis 1:1), Trevor Peterson, 05/22/2002
- RE: Et (Genesis 1:1), Lisbeth S. Fried, 05/22/2002
- RE: Et (Genesis 1:1), Lisbeth S. Fried, 05/22/2002
- Re: Et (Genesis 1:1), Charles David Isbell, 05/22/2002
- Re: Et (Genesis 1:1), uri hurwitz, 05/22/2002
- Re: Et (Genesis 1:1), Daniel Walin, 05/22/2002
- Re: Et (Genesis 1:1), Dr. Reinhard G.Lehmann, 05/23/2002
- RE: Et (Genesis 1:1), Peter Kirk, 05/23/2002
- Re: Et (Genesis 1:1), Matthew Anstey, 05/24/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.