b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Madden, Shawn" <sMadden AT sebts.edu>
- To: "Jonathan D. Safren" <yonsaf AT beitberl.ac.il>, "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question
- Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 11:53:35 -0400
This
is a test to see if I can send to follks from e-mail and not just through the
forum on the web. I will send the same message on the web just incase one goes
through and the other does not.
Might
the question of using modern Hebrew to teach classical Hebrew not be handled
this way. There is a school of thought that in the teaching of classical Hebrew
one is merely teaching the students to observe what has been produced by the
ancient writers and is not really that interested in "producing" or "creating"
sentences in classical Hebrew. I use this method my self. However, I saw a
history channel series on Elizabeth I that pointed out that she was taught her
plethora of non-English languages by having her not only be able to read what
she found already produced but she was also required to produce dialogue in
those languages. It was said on that show that that was the superior method of
teaching a foreign language. ONe of our professors here at Southeastern who was
taught a Jewish Union in Cincinatti, remarked that that was how he was taught
and that he did the same thing in his class. If you look at Wiengreen's textbook
he has exercises in both Hebrew to English and English to
Hebrew.
So,
that being said, is it not more to the point that in teaching Hebrew the
students could/should learn to produce the language (whether in Modern or
Classical forms) to improve their understanding and skills? I am considering
this for my next year's class.
To the
other point about learning modern Hebrew to access the works of modern Hebrew
scholars. Good idea but so too one should have a facility in a plethora of
languages that have secondary works in those languages about classical Hebrew.
Again, German being primary, but also French, Dutch, Italian, Modern Hebrew,
etc. Of course this works out that one should know a whole bunch of languages to
seriously be able (yes, I like to regularly split infinitives!) to address
an issue, not just the modern version of the classical language under
consideration.
-
RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question
, (continued)
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Jim West, 05/17/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Trevor Peterson, 05/17/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Trevor Peterson, 05/17/2002
- Re: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Jonathan D. Safren, 05/18/2002
- Re: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Jonathan D. Safren, 05/18/2002
- Re: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, James C. Kirk, 05/18/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, uri hurwitz, 05/18/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Shawn Madden, 05/18/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Peter Kirk, 05/18/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, jwest, 05/18/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Madden, Shawn, 05/18/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Lisbeth S. Fried, 05/18/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Dave Washburn, 05/18/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Trevor & Julie Peterson, 05/18/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Stephen C. Carlson, 05/18/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Jim West, 05/18/2002
- RE: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Matthew Anstey, 05/20/2002
- Re: OFF TOPIC Modern Hebrew question, Jonathan D. Safren, 05/20/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.