Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: Dahood

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
  • To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: Dahood
  • Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 06:44:05 -0700


> Dear List-members!
>
> In the introduction to his Commentary on Ps 1-50 (Word Biblical Commentary
> 1983), Craigie quotes Albright about Dahood's commentary on the Psalms (AB):
> "Even if only a third of his (Dahood's) new interpretations of the Psalter
> are correct in principle - and I should put the total proportion higher - he
> has contributed more than all other scholars together, over the past two
> thousend years, to the elucidation of the Psalter"
>
> Dahood really introduced new thoughts into the exegesis of the Psalter.
>
> Craigie writes: "In this commentary, wich owes a great deal to the insight
> of Mitchell Dahood, an attempt has been made to evaluate crtitcally Dahood's
> contributions to the study of Psalms 1-50. The critical evaluation is very
> limited, principally because the extent of Dahood's work is so massive that
> a complete book would be required for critical evaluation alone"
>
> Does anyone know about such an evaluation?
>
I don't know of a line-by-line evaluation - Dahood's commentary was
3 volumes after all - but there were plenty of fairly extensive reviews
when it first appeared. His dependence on Ugaritic had one of two
effects on reviewers: either they loved it or they hated it. There
seemed to be no in-between, a reviewer either hailed it as the
greatest achievement of the century in Hebrew studies, as Albright
did, or they castigated it as a joke because he erroneously
(according to the reviewer) leaned so heavily on a cognate language
at the expense of other more traditional branches of philology as
well as the Qumran scrolls.

Dahood wrote a response to these criticisms called "Ugaritic and
Phoenician or Qumran and the Versions" published in _Orient and
Occident: Essays Presented to Cyrus H. Gordon on the Occasion of
His Sixty-Fifth Birthday_ ed. by Harry A. Hoffner, Jr, AOAT 22
(Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1973) p. 53-58. In it he
argued that cognate languages are going to be much more useful
for advancing biblical Hebrew philology than resorting to versions
and recensions such as those found at Qumran.

Whatever one thinks of Dahood's approach, the one thing that a
researcher in the Psalms cannot do is ignore it.
Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
This time, like all times, is a very good one if we but know what to do
with it.
-Emerson




  • Dahood, Johannes Hellberg, 01/21/2002
    • <Possible follow-up(s)>
    • Re: Dahood, Dave Washburn, 01/21/2002
    • RE: Dahood, Peter Kirk, 01/21/2002
    • Re: Dahood, ianyoung, 01/21/2002

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page