b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Christian M. M. Brady" <christian.brady AT tulane.edu>
- To: H-Bible <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Genesis
- Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2000 14:12:26 -0500
On 9/3/00 11:11 AM, "Jim West" <jwest AT highland.net> wrote:
> At 09:27 AM 9/3/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>> But the same arguments that you are presenting for the Hasmonean period
>> could be used to justify dating the text to the United Monarchy (as has
>> been). The people have just conquered a land and united diverse tribes
>> which
>> now need a unifying history, thus the king of the day orders a history to
>> be
>> written that justifies their existence. Works kind of well for
>> David/Solomon, don't you think? ;-)
>
> save for one fact--- the language of the texts is much later than the period
> of the united monarchy. fred cryer demonstrated this, to my mind
> conclusively, in his SJOT article several years back.
>
There is the difference. Fred has not convinced many others of that point.
Cb
cbrady @ tulane.edu
--
"An optimist is a guy that has never had much experience."
Don Marquis, 'archy & mehitabel', 1927
-
RE: Genesis
, (continued)
- RE: Genesis, Liz Fried, 09/02/2000
- Genesis, Harold R. Holmyard III, 09/02/2000
- Re: Genesis, Peter Kirk, 09/02/2000
- RE: Genesis, Dave Washburn, 09/02/2000
- RE: Genesis, Liz Fried, 09/02/2000
- Re: Genesis, Christian M. M. Brady, 09/02/2000
- Re: Genesis, Christian M. M. Brady, 09/02/2000
- Re: Genesis, Jim West, 09/02/2000
- Re: Genesis, Christian M. M. Brady, 09/03/2000
- Re: Genesis, Jim West, 09/03/2000
- Re: Genesis, Christian M. M. Brady, 09/03/2000
- Re: Genesis, Christian M. M. Brady, 09/03/2000
- RE: Genesis, Niels Peter Lemche, 09/03/2000
- Re: Genesis, barre, 09/08/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.