b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Michael Hildenbrand <hildenbr AT Haas.Berkeley.EDU>
- To: Dave Washburn <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
- Cc: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Gen 2:4
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Actually, YOM falls into quite clear categories. When it is not augmented
(prefixed pronoun-like "b"- or in the plural) the word *always* refers to
a literal day (some 200x), Gen 1 of course being a battleground. Further
in Gen 1, YOM is delimited by "evening and morning" which is never used in
reference to anything else but a literal day. I am sure that we do not
want to get too deeply into this (presuppositions being what they are in
this area)-I don't either. BDB had this figured out a long time ago (they
have these categories very clearly set out). Also Evan-Shoshan divides up
the usages quite neatly.
Michael
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Dave Washburn wrote:
> Tony,
> >
> > I was wondering about Gen 2:4 in relation to Gen 1. Gen 1 gives the
> > chronological sequence of the creation account as six days. Gen 2:4 makes
> > reference to "in the day" (BYoM) that God created the heavens and the
> > earth.
> > It seems to capsulize the whole creation into one day. I also noticed a
> > number of translations render the phrase "In the day" as "at the time"
> > (Goodspeed, Moffatt, Jerusalem Bible) Is the contrast between 6 days in
> > Gen
> > 1 and the mention of "in the day" (singular) a result of the dual
> > authorsip
> > of Gen 1 as the work of the Elohist editor and the Gen 2:4 reference the
> > work of the Priestly editor or simply an acceptable literary device? Any
> > comments would be appreciated. Many thanks.
>
> It simply shows the flexibility of the word YOM. This is just one of
> many instances where it doesn't necessarily mean a 24-hour
> period, but simply refers to an undefined period of time. A short
> study of the word will demonstrate this easily. It's not necessary
> to resort to various authorships, redactions or literary devices; it's a
> simple matter of semantics, i.e. the meaning of the word.
>
>
> Dave Washburn
> http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
> "Éist le glór Dé."
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: [hildenbr AT Haas.Berkeley.EDU]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> leave-b-hebrew-101828C AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
> To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
>
>
-
Gen 2:4,
Tony Costa, 08/14/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Gen 2:4, Liz Fried, 08/14/2000
- Re: Gen 2:4, Dave Washburn, 08/14/2000
- Re: Gen 2:4, Lee R. Martin, 08/14/2000
- Re: Gen 2:4, Lee R. Martin, 08/14/2000
- Re: Gen 2:4, Peter Kirk, 08/14/2000
- Re: Gen 2:4, Michael Hildenbrand, 08/14/2000
- Re: Gen 2:4, Michael Hildenbrand, 08/14/2000
- Re: Gen 2:4, clayton stirling bartholomew, 08/15/2000
- Re: Gen 2:4, Peter Kirk, 08/15/2000
- Re: Gen 2:4, Rolf Furuli, 08/15/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.