Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: Diachronic Hebrew wayyiqtol (WAW the conjunction)

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Galia Hatav <ghatav AT aall.ufl.edu>
  • To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
  • Subject: Re: Diachronic Hebrew wayyiqtol (WAW the conjunction)
  • Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:26:56 +0100



Dear Rolf,

How many of those WAYYIQTOLS woth cohortative are from the books attributed
to the First Temple? This is a crucial detail since one of the arguments
that the aspect system in the Second Temple had collapsed is that WAYYIQTOL
may come with cohortative.

Thanks,

Galia

>Dear Henry,
>
>In my post of Feb. 20th. I made some comments regarding WAYYIQTOL with
>cohortative. My data search did not give wholly correct numbers, but now I
>have looked at each example and give the following revised numbers:
>
>WAYYIQTOLs with cohortative ending in all books: 661
>
>The following verbs cannot take cohortative,
> lamed he verbs: 44
> verbs with suffixes: 52
>The following must also be excluded from possible examples,
> apocopated forms of WAYYIQTOLs 1 person: 68
> WEYIQTOLs wrongly counted as WAYYIQTOLs:76
>
>This means that (44+52+68+76) = 240 examples must be substracted from the
>number of 661. The result is that 421 of the WAYYIQTOLs of the Tanach *can*
>take cohortative. I found that 82 of these had cohortative ending, and this
>means that 19.5% of the possible examples of WAYYIQTOL have cohortative
>ending.
>
>Of the 68 apocopated forms, 54 were lamed he verbs, and this means that 55%
>of the lamed he verbs that *can* be apocopated are apocopated.
>
>
>Regards
>Rolf
>
>
>Rolf Furuli
>University of Oslo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---
>You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: ghatav AT aall.ufl.edu
>To unsubscribe, forward this message to
>$subst('Email.Unsub')
>To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page