b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Jim West <jwest AT Highland.Net>
- To: Jonathan D Safren <yonsaf AT beitberl.beitberl.ac.il>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: historiography
- Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2000 12:00:12 -0500
At 06:48 PM 1/1/00 +0200, you wrote:
>Isn't it odd that, even for those parts of the existence of the Kingdoms
>of Israel and Judah that are confirmed by external epigraphy, we don't
>possess even one Israelite or Judahite royal inscription?
>Notice I'm not talking about administrative documents or letters, which
>would have been written on perishable materials (only ostraca have
>survived, and those not from high-ranking officials), but about the kind
>of inscriptions that woulod have been written on stone or plaster, such
>as the Mesha Inscription, the Tell Dan Inscription or the Deir Alla
>Plaster Inscription (not royal).
>If it weren't for chance mention of Israelite and Jodahite kings by
>Assyrian. Moabite and Aramean epigraphy, then one could claim that the
>Kingdoms of Israel and Judah never existed.
>So I ask these questions.
>1) Perhaps royal inscriptions were not part of the Israelite and
>Judahite scribal/royal tradition? And/or
This would be extremely unique wouldn't it? We have precisely this kind of
material for all of the surrounding cultures, but none for Israel- which
reached great expanse during the "Solomonic" era.... (according to the DH).
That is just so odd that it requires some significant consideration, it
seems to me.
>2) Perhaps too much is being claimed on the basis of chance findings or
>non-findings?
That is possibly true. Chance plays far too great a role in such matters.
But again, what are the chances that the surrounding civilizations left some
trace and Israel alone did not? Let me hasten to say- I think there was an
"Israel" in the pre-babylonian era. But I dont think it was what the DH
says it was.
>3) Perhaps the blanket rejection of Biblical historiography is
>unwarranted?
Any blanket rejection of anything is unwarranted. But when evidence is
lacking for something we must wonder why that is and what really was there.
Best, as always,
Jim
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jim West, ThD
jwest AT highland.net
http://web.infoave.net/~jwest
-
Re: historiography,
Polycarp66, 01/01/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: historiography,
Jim West, 01/01/2000
- Re: historiography, Jonathan D. Safren, 01/02/2000
-
Message not available
- Re: historiography (Jonathan), Ian Hutchesson, 01/02/2000
-
Message not available
-
Re: historiography (Jonathan),
Jonathan D. Safren, 01/02/2000
- Re: historiography (Jonathan), Ian Hutchesson, 01/02/2000
-
Re: historiography (Jonathan),
Jonathan D. Safren, 01/02/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.