b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Jonathan D. Safren" <yonsaf AT beitberl.beitberl.ac.il>
- To: Jonathan Bailey <jonathan.bailey AT gmx.de>
- Cc: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Successful challenges
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 15:05:20 +0200
Jonathan Bailey wrote:
> ---------- Original Message ----------
>
> >Dear Jonathan,
> >What do you do with Gen. 36 31, "And these are the kings that reigned
> >in Edom before there reigned a king of/over Israel"? Even Rashi
> >attributed this king-list to the time of King Jehoshafat, leading Ibn
> >Ezra to proclaim that his book should be burned. What do you do with all
> >the other verses indicating late authorship of the Pentateuch?
>
> Gen 36,31 is a matter of interpretation. I interpret the verse as Moses
> basically saying
> "Edomites have already had a slew of Kings, and we haven't even had one
> yet."
>
> Now remember, this is after Jacob had gotten the birthright, yet there had
> already
> been a slew of Edomite kings, and none for Israel. The theme is that the
> temporal
> things of the world get their glory first, but only for a while, while the
> things of God
> have to wait for a time, but then they get their glory. At least this is
> how I interpret the
> passage from my pauline lense.
>
> Now we know that Israel conceived itself of Israel far before the monarchy,
> and
> expectations of a king were probably common. After all, everybody else,
> even fleshly
> Esau, had them. The use of the infinitive here may indicate that the author
> was not
> speaking from the perspective of an author in the far future about an
> already
> completed event. Therefore I see it somewhat like 'they already have all
> these kings
> and we haven't even gotten one yet'. Such would be an attidute of the Jews
> in Egypt,
> wondering about what it means to get the birthright and be slaves in Egypt
> while the
> fleshly brother loses his birthright and becomes the founder of a great
> nation. This
> statement is a good indicator of a tradition or a source that Moses would
> have
> incorporated into Genesis.
>
Dear Jonathan,
There wasn't any permanent settlement in Edom until the mid-13th century BCE.
The Edomite kingship wouldn't have been established immediately, but only
after a process of
development, as in Israel. The Bible is not talking of kings of Esau, but
kings of Edom. There's
quite a list, and if the list isn't talking about local kinglets reigning at
the same time (as
the judges in the Book ofJudges), then Edomite kingship was established some
time before the
Israelite one. The author of the list in Gen. 36 is looking back at all this.
Sincerely,
--
Jonathan D. Safren
Dept. of Biblical Studies
Beit Berl College
Beit Berl Post Office 44905
Israel
-
Successful challenges,
Jonathan Bailey, 12/19/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Successful challenges, Jonathan D. Safren, 12/20/1999
- Re[2]: Successful challenges, Jonathan Bailey, 12/20/1999
- Re[2]: Successful challenges, Jonathan Bailey, 12/20/1999
- Re: Successful challenges, Jonathan D. Safren, 12/20/1999
- Re: Successful challenges, Ruthy & Baruch, 12/20/1999
- Re: Re[2]: Successful challenges, Paul Zellmer, 12/20/1999
- Re[4]: Successful challenges, Jonathan Bailey, 12/21/1999
- Re: Successful challenges, RHutchin, 12/22/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.