b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Jonathan Bailey <jonathan.bailey AT gmx.de>
- To: Biblical Hebrew list <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re[4]: a tiberian weak spot?
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 00:35:41 +0100
I guess I am a little behind here. I say that G-Stem and D-Stem are Paal and
Piel and
you tell me I am wrong and to see another thread, and there you say that G and
D-Stem are Paal and Piel. I am not sure I am following your objection. Is it
because I
made the link to Akkadian? So exactly where do the terms come from? I have
only
seen them used for Akkadian and in comparative semitic contexts.
Jonathan Bailey
Hochschule für Jüdische Studien
Heidelberg
---------- Original Message ----------
>At 09:08 PM 12/9/99 +0100, you wrote:
>>They are akkadian terms, if I am correct. They are like Binyanim. G-Stem is
>like Pa'al
>>(Grundstam)
>nope.
>see previous note on the thread.
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>Jim West, ThD
>jwest AT highland.net
>http://web.infoave.net/~jwest
>"This is the sort of nonsense up with which I will not put." Winston
>Churchill
-
a tiberian weak spot?,
Vincent DeCaen, 12/09/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: a tiberian weak spot?, peter_kirk, 12/09/1999
- Re[2]: a tiberian weak spot?, Jonathan Bailey, 12/09/1999
- Re: Re[2]: a tiberian weak spot?, Jim West, 12/09/1999
- Re: a tiberian weak spot?, Jim West, 12/09/1999
- Re[4]: a tiberian weak spot?, Jonathan Bailey, 12/09/1999
- Re: Re[4]: a tiberian weak spot?, Dave Washburn, 12/10/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.