b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: John Ronning <ronning AT ilink.nis.za>
- To: "Jonathan D. Safren" <yonsaf AT beitberl.beitberl.ac.il>, Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk)
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 06:22:04 +0200
(offlist)
"Jonathan D. Safren" wrote:
> . . .
> There was only one destroyed occupation level of Hazor which would fit
> the Settlement Period, so either the Joshua narrative is true or the
> Judges narrative is true, not both. Considering the penchant of the
> author of Joshua to invent "salvation history", I would opt for the
> Judges narrative being true.
Dear Jonathan,
Unless I'm missing something, Judges 4-5 says nothing about Hazor being
destroyed, unless you want to infer it from Judges 4:24 (they "cut off"
Jabin). The king's name is the same in Joshua and Judges, but there is
also a Jabin of Hazor mentioned in some cuneiform source from around the
18th century - maybe a dynastic name.
Yours,
John
-
Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk)
, (continued)
- Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Peter_Kirk, 01/21/1999
- Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Ian Hutchesson, 01/21/1999
- Re[2]: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Peter_Kirk, 01/24/1999
- Re: Re[2]: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Ian Hutchesson, 01/24/1999
- Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Jonathan D. Safren, 01/25/1999
- Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), John Ronning, 01/25/1999
- Re[4]: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Peter_Kirk, 01/25/1999
- Re: Re[4]: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Ian Hutchesson, 01/25/1999
- Re[2]: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Peter_Kirk, 01/25/1999
- Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Jonathan D. Safren, 01/25/1999
- Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), John Ronning, 01/25/1999
- Re[2]: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Peter_Kirk, 01/26/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.