b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Jonathan D. Safren" <yonsaf AT beitberl.beitberl.ac.il>
- To: Peter_Kirk AT SIL.ORG
- Cc: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk)
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:01:19 +0200
Peter_Kirk AT SIL.ORG wrote:
and maybe the bricks or stones remaining above ground, from the walls
and the houses, were deliberately taken away in connection with the
curse on rebuilding the city (6:26).
Is there anything in this speculative reconstruction which conflicts
with the archaeological record?
Dear Peter,
The main problem in trying to reconstruct a supposed Joshuan conquest of Jericho is that this story is only one of a number of unhistorical conquest narratives in the Book of Joshua.
Take, for example, the conquest of Ai, a city which had been destroyed many hundreds of years before the appearance of the Israelites, had never been reconstructed, and even whose name had been forgotten - Ai means "heap of ruins", similar to tel. Or the narrative of Joshua's campaign against the Northern Coalition, headed by Jabin, king of Hazor, a story reduplicated in Jud. 4. Or the herem of the Canaanites - peerhaps a local phenomenon, but when transferred to the national scene, wishful thinking of a late monotheist.
Actually, the problem begins with the whole historiographical concept of the Book of Joshua, a unified conquest of Canaan, by a whole God-fearing People of Israel under the leadership of Joshua, according to the program laid down in Josh. 1 and summarized in Josh. 23. What the author of Joshua intends to present as "history", or more properly, "salvation history", is by and large unhistorical, but many of the details presented inadvertently, as it were, between the lines, contain valuable historical information.
For example, Josh. 14: 6, "...Caleb, the son of Yefuneh, the Kenizzite...", or Josh. 15:13, "And to Caleb, the son of Yefuneh, he gave a portion among the Judahites..." - from which we can learn that Caleb and the Caslebites were not originally Judahites or Israelites (assuming that the Judahites were originally Israelites - not necessarily so), but Kenizzites, one of the Canaanite peoples mentioned in Gen. 15:19.
Sincerely,
Jonathan D. Safren
Dept. of Biblical Studies
Beit Berl College
Beit Berl Post Office 44905
Israel
-
Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk),
Ian Hutchesson, 01/19/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Steve .Thompson AT avondale.edu.au, 01/21/1999
- Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Peter_Kirk, 01/21/1999
- Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Ian Hutchesson, 01/21/1999
- Re[2]: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Peter_Kirk, 01/24/1999
- Re: Re[2]: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Ian Hutchesson, 01/24/1999
- Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Jonathan D. Safren, 01/25/1999
- Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), John Ronning, 01/25/1999
- Re[4]: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Peter_Kirk, 01/25/1999
- Re: Re[4]: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Ian Hutchesson, 01/25/1999
- Re[2]: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Peter_Kirk, 01/25/1999
- Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Jonathan D. Safren, 01/25/1999
- Re: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), John Ronning, 01/25/1999
- Re[2]: Kenyon etc (Peter Kirk), Peter_Kirk, 01/26/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.