Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: Enuma Elish

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Irene Riegner <iriegner AT concentric.net>
  • To: John Ronning <ronning AT ilink.nis.za>
  • Cc: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: Enuma Elish
  • Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 11:34:01 -0500

Dear List People

John Ronning quoting himself and Jonathan Safren and then responding to J. Safren wrote (and I'm not always sure who is quoting who and who is responding) 

Your point is valid that Gen 1:2 seems to presume pre-existent matter,
but my point is
that this matter is not said to be eternal - was it previously created
or not?  I don't
think Genesis 1 addresses the issue,
 
The question of the creation of pre-existant matter and whether this is eternal  are not questions which concerned the writers of Gen 1 (or Gen 2 for that matter).  They were not interested in first causes and absolute beginnings and would probably not even understand this question. This question of first causes was the concern of Greek philosophy.  The various, Greek creation myths don't even address this issue. They, like the Enuma Elish, assume some kind of "pre-existing" chaos.  The "innovation" of Gen 1 might be its description of this "pre-existing" material as something that is not only unformed but quiescent rather than chaotic---lifeless---and that the deity provided the form and movement---life---to this material.

    BTW, I'm not sure I like the term "pre-existent matter."  If it's physical matter, then it exists even if it is in a different state than the one we know (and love).

    Can we understand the cosmic perspective of Gen 1 as an expansion of the perspective of Gen 2, which focuses on the earth?  Gen 1 responds to the more cosmic concerns of the Assyrian and Babylonian myths and represents an expanded Israelite/Judahite perspective and response to the influence of a foreign culture.

    What is the relationship between the idea of an absolute beginning (creatio ex nihilo) and an endtime, especially an apocalyptic endtime?  Does one require the other?
 

irene



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page