b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Peter_Kirk AT SIL.ORG
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re[2]: Translation
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 23:13 -0500 (EST)
This sounds a great idea in theory but how far do you take it? Idioms
from the original often just don't communicate properly. I guess )FP
taken alone doesn't mean "anger" any more than it means "face", and
)EREK )APPAYIM is just an idiom... but would you really translate (in
Exodus 34:6 etc) that YHWH has a long nose?! :-)
Peter Kirk
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Translation
Author: tiphillips AT infoave.net at internet
Date: 28/10/1998 11:17
This has been my problem with (English) translations, and also Fox but to a
lesser extent. I would like to see the Tanak presented as the non-English,
non-Western document(s) it/they are. Idioms say a lot of how the writers and
their culture thought. They should be retained as much as possible. That's
why I began working on my own translation again. Won't be perfect, maybe not
"flowing verse" but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Fox still makes
too many accommodations.
Shalom,
Tim
...
-
Translation,
Irene Riegner, 10/28/1998
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Translation, Irene Riegner, 10/28/1998
- RE: Translation, Steve Brailsford, 10/28/1998
- Re: Translation, T.L. Phillips, 10/28/1998
-
Re: Translation,
Bryan Rocine, 10/28/1998
- Re: Steam, Irene Riegner, 10/29/1998
- Re[2]: Translation, Peter_Kirk, 10/30/1998
- Re: Translation, TL Phillips, 10/30/1998
-
Re: Translation,
Irene Riegner, 10/31/1998
-
Re: Translation,
TL Phillips, 10/31/1998
- Re: Translation, Irene Riegner, 10/31/1998
-
Re: Translation,
TL Phillips, 10/31/1998
- Re: Translation, Irene Riegner, 10/31/1998
- Re[2]: Translation, Peter_Kirk, 10/31/1998
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.