b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "T.L. Phillips" <tiphillips AT infoave.net>
- To: "Steve Brailsford" <Steve.Brailsford AT seagatesoftware.com>, "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Fox's first two days
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 11:08:44 -0500
Not having a septuaginta around, what does it say? Does it use "chaos"?
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Brailsford <Steve.Brailsford AT seagatesoftware.com>
To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Wednesday, October 28, 1998 8:54 AM
Subject: RE: Fox's first two days
>Bryan,
>I really appreciated your pointing out the bias and outlook of Fox's
>translation. I was not aware of this.
>
>Ian,
>I would be careful when I used to word chaos. Although the current
>vernacular is appropriate, there is a distinction in the sciences, or
>specifically Physics, between chaos and randomness. Chaos infers an order
>that is too complicated to ascertain. Mathematically, randomness is
defined
>as NO order. With that definition, I would assert that the appropriate
word
>to use would be "uncollected and random." In any event, your separation of
>three days of creation and then three days of ordering is instructive.
>
> Also, I found an interesting definition or chaos in Expedia.
>Chaos, in one ancient Greek myth of creation, the dark, silent abyss from
>which all things came into existence. According to the Theogony of Greek
>poet Hesiod, Chaos generated Earth, from which arose the starry,
>cloud-filled Heaven. In a later theory, Chaos was the formless matter from
>which the cosmos, or harmonious order, was created.
>
>I was wondering if they were trying to infer that the OT account was later
>than the Greek mythos.
>
>Steve Brailsford
>NOBTS Student - Orlando Extension
>Seagate Software
>steve.brailsford AT seagatesoftware.com
>(407) 531-7543
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bryan Rocine [mailto:596547 AT ican.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 1998 9:31 PM
>To: Biblical Hebrew
>Subject: Re: Fox's first two days
>> >
>> > >> 2 when the earth was wild and waste,
>> >
>> > Though poetic, doesn't the "waste" take away from the meaning here? The
>> > wildness gives cause for the events of the first three days: order is
>> placed
>> > over the chaos, while the following three days populates the emptiness.
>> > Waste doesn't seem to be as apt as the AV "void" or "emptiness", does
>it?
>> >
>> >
>> > I think your obsevation on Fox's treatment of _tohu vabohu_ is an
>important
>> > case in point when considring the Fox translation.
>>
>> The first series deals with the tohu reducing the chaos to order, the
>other,
>> filling the corresponding void. It would seem that the expression tohu
>> vabohu was explicitly used to point to the structure imposed on the
>creation.
>
>---
>You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: tiphillips AT infoave.net
>To unsubscribe, forward this message to
$subst('Email.Unsub')
>
-
Fox's first two days,
Bryan Rocine, 10/26/1998
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Fox's first two days, Lewis Reich, 10/27/1998
- Re: Fox's first two days, Ian Hutchesson, 10/27/1998
- Re: Fox's first two days, Bryan Rocine, 10/27/1998
- Re: Fox's first two days, Bryan Rocine, 10/27/1998
- Re: Fox's first two days, Ian Hutchesson, 10/27/1998
- RE: Fox's first two days, Steve Brailsford, 10/28/1998
- Re: Fox's first two days, T.L. Phillips, 10/28/1998
- Re: Fox's first two days, Bryan Rocine, 10/28/1998
- Re: Fox's first two days, Stephen C. Carlson, 10/28/1998
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.