Towards standard methods and metrics for evaluating IA

[Rashmi Sinha <rashmi AT rashmisinha.com>]

Ignore mail below. This is from two days ago. Got resent due to some 
problem with my mail client.
-rashmi

At 12:49 PM 8/4/2003 -0700, Rashmi Sinha wrote:
> Below are some issues and questions we can try to address tomorrow during 
> the IM meeting. Please feel to add to the list. The hope is that by the 
> end of tomorrow's meeting, we will be to identify two or three main issues 
> we need to be addressing now and assign each of those tasks to one or more 
> individuals.
>
> Please feel free to add / suggest changes to below list.
>
> 1) Scope of project:
>         (Information Architecture or User Experience at large)
>
> 2) How should project be structured?
>         (We can take the four steps I proposed in the mail yesterday as a 
> starting point for discussion)
>
> 3) What kind of contributions should we call for
>         (design and evaluation methods? DO we need to be specific about 
> what kind?)
>
> 4) What should the call for contributions be like?
>         (For example: How should authors/contributors make their 
> contributions: submit a url / upload material / email document to one of us.)
>
> 5) Where should project materials live: on AIfIA site / on author site / both?
>
> 6) What should the agreement between AIfIA and authors be like?
>
> 7) How should the project site be organized (should it be a wiki?)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aifia-metrics mailing list
> Aifia-metrics AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/aifia-metrics