From carrie at stayfreemagazine.org Fri Oct 17 13:52:55 2003 From: carrie at stayfreemagazine.org (Carrie McLaren) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:52:55 -0500 Subject: Stay Free! #21 now available Message-ID: Hello, I am pleased to inform you that a new issue of Stay Free! is now available for purchase. You can pick it up at finer independent book/record stores (plus Barnes & Noble and Tower) or online straight from the source: http://www.stayfreemagazine.org/order Of course, we'd prefer that you subscribe since we make a lot more money that way. Subscriptions run from $7 to $20 for three issues; people who subscribe in the new few days will be receive an invite to our upcoming subscribers bash in Brooklyn. Info: http://www.stayfreemagazine.org/order :::::::: Introduction to #21 > The Psychology Issue http://www.stayfreemagazine.org/archives/21/index.html In 1999, sixty psychologists and psychiatrists sent a letter to the American Psychological Association (APA) urging it to oppose advertising to children. You had to admire their moxie: The APA represents a field that practically owes its existence to advertising. The roots of the psychology industry date from the turn of the 20th century, when both advertisers and psychologists were scorned by their peers. Economists, bankers, and executives equated ad men with sideshow barkers, while scientists considered psychologists no better than fortune-tellers. To bolster their credibility, ad agents turned to psychologists and vice versa. By applying psychological theories to advertising, psychologists hoped to prove themselves practical; by incorporating psychology in ad campaigns, ad agents hoped to prove themselves scientific. (Psychology wasn't yet seen as a science, but that's another story.) John B. Watson, America's answer to Pavlov, personifies the triumph of both fields-the founder of behaviorism, which dominated psychological theory in the 1930s, he was also a vice president of J. Walter Thompson, a leading advertising agency at the time and currently the world's largest ad firm. Psychologists allied themselves with business in other ways, as in "human engineering." Ana Marie Cox explores this history in her article on employee personality testing (p. 22), while Gaylord Fields and Matthew Flaming expose the psychological notions at work in another economic realm: grocery shopping (pp. 32 and 34). Like psychology, psychiatry has been shaped by business interests-and though we're calling this the psychology issue of Stay Free!, it is equally about psychiatry. (Psychology covers everyday habits of the mind; psychiatry deals with aberrations.) In his stellar history of the lobotomy, Elliot Valenstein (interview, p. 12) describes how the field of psychiatry has, like psychology, faced economic pressures. Thrifty state governments, competition from neuroscientists and nonmedical therapists, and a burgeoning pharmaceutical industry have ultimately contributed to psychiatry's turn away from an environmental approach to mental illness and toward biological models. The point of this issue of Stay Free! is a simple one: Both psychology and psychiatry purport to help people yet remain seriously conscribed by money and politics. C O N T E N T S "Better Living Through Lobotomy: What can the history of lobotomy tell us about psychosurgery today?" Allison Xantha Miller interviews Elliot Valenstein "I Am Never Lonely: A brief history of employee personality testing" by Ana Marie Cox "Prozac Nations" Lawrence Kirmayer discusses cross-cultural mental health "Curious Mental Illnesses of the World" by Carrie McLaren and Alexandra Ringe "Buyer Beware: How do shoppers respond when items are mysteriously placed in their baskets?" Gaylord Field experiments "Secret Shopper: The psychology of grocery store design" by Matthew Flaming "Borderline Hysteria: The history of psychosomatic illness" Carrie McLaren interviews Edward Shorter "Sick in the Head" Stay Free! readers share their psychosomatic complaints "Enter the Wolfman: The syndrome that makes you howl at the moon" by Brian Boling and Matt Dicke http://www.new-guns.com by Jason Torchinsky [ This appeared as a fake ad in the magazine but it's been made into a web site ] and lots more! From stay.free at verizon.net Thu Oct 23 15:11:35 2003 From: stay.free at verizon.net (Carrie McLaren) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:11:35 -0500 Subject: Stay Free! | October 23 Message-ID: NIKE SUES ARTISTS OVER SATIRE Wish I Thought of it Department: the European art group 0100101110101101.ORG has created a fake Nike website, Nike Ground (http://www.nikeground.com), portraying the company as real-estate vultures who buy streets and squares in cities around the world in order to rename them and install giant monuments of the swoosh. The site looks and feels so much like a Nike site that even the savviest web surfers should be forgiven for missing the point. But if ambiguity makes for a muddy message, it also insures that Nike will take note, and indeed -- Phil Knight et al. have issued a 30-page injunction demanding the immediate removal of material related to copyrighted material. Here's hoping that Nike Ground gets a ton of publicity for this and spurs much-needed discussions about the corporate takeover of public space. "ARE YOU READY FOR SOME UNSWOOSHING?" Adbusters is going to start selling its own line of sneakers, and you can read the Salon article--and several hostile letters to the editor--here: http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2003/10/08/blackspot/index.html http://archive.salon.com/tech/letters/2003/10/13/adbusters/index.html Personally, I'm all for sellilng clothes that aren't made with slave labor. The idea that this is somehow "unbranding," however, doesn't make any sense. ELECTRONIC VOTING = SERIOUSLY FUCKED "A quiet revolution is taking place in US politics. By the time it's over, the integrity of elections will be in the unchallenged, unscrutinized control of a few large--and pro-Republican--corporations." http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/1013-01.htm Mandatory reading, whatever your politics. If you think Florida's voting machines are a mess, you haven't seen nothing: the new electronic voting systems are riddled with flaws -- and owned by Republicans who want to keep source code and voter data secret ("proprietary information"). This is the best article I've seen on this issue in months. Naturally, it comes from outside the U.S.