Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.
  • Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:26:03 -0600

Is the icedtea downloading the prebuilt java gentoo to build the new java
version?

if not could it be the $SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS[0] be causing the problem with the
pentuim-m arch?

maybe it needs a default to download the x86 version if all else fails?

CuZnDragon


On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:01:59 -0500
Sukneet Basuta <sukneet AT gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Javier Vasquez <j.e.vasquez.v AT gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > No problems with glib 2.17...
> >
> > However it didn't solve anything.
> >
> > Apparently I can select pentium-m, neither native, as architectures
> > for this pentium-m laptop, :-(, at least not if I want java enabled
> > (everything else compiled and installed and apparently works)...
> >
> > So I'll be reverting to i686, and doing "sorcery -r", to see if I can
> > get to the state I was before specifying architectures corresponding
> > to the laptop's processor. Ironically I believed things could only
> > get better by selecting architectures closer to the processor one.
> > It'll take like a week, so I won't know till then...
> >
> > Definitely not what I wanted, but it's taking too much time without
> > success.
>
> You shouldn't have to recompile everything. Maybe try just recompiling
> the spells java depends on.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page