Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Assembling image.tar.bz2 for installation iso

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • To: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
  • Cc: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Assembling image.tar.bz2 for installation iso
  • Date: 21 Apr 2003 23:52:08 -0400

ooops, nope, it was decided that X wouldn't be included as depends.
Perhaps that should be amended to apps which don't use X for a GUI
should include as a depends, or if it's optional?

On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 23:27, Casey Harkins wrote:
> On 21 Apr 2003, Dufflebunk wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 22:52, Casey Harkins wrote:
> > > I tried pulling just the relevant spells into the chroot environment by
> > > processing their install logs. With a few tweaks to take care of some of
> > > the aliens, this worked until I tried to rebuild in the chroot. Some of
> > > these spells had grown dependent on the X11 libraries (though their
> > > dependency info in /var/state/sorcery/depends did not reflect this
> > > dependency).
> > You should probably file bugs about these, if the spells lack the
> > depends info in them.
>
> So all x apps should depend either implicitly or explicity on xfree86? If
> so, I'm sure there are quite a few that should. The problems I was having
> was with the editors (vim, jed) providing an optional X interface if the
> libraries exist when they are built, they'll both need optional depends on
> xfree86.
<snip>
--


Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
-----------------
PGP public key at
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3327A9A5
F1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page