Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] Psi

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tanner Lovelace" <clubjuggler AT gmail.com>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Psi
  • Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:39:03 -0400

On 9/6/07, Mark Turner <markt AT siteseers.net> wrote:
> Michael Czeiszperger wrote:
> > Wow, that is news! Would those tests happen to be:
> >
> > 1. repeatable by independent sources
> > 2. double blind
> > 3. published in a reputable scientific journal
> >
> >
> ...and just to offer some proof, here's one. Heard of the IEEE? :)
>
> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1454382
> http://www.espresearch.com/espgeneral/IEEE-329B.shtml

Be fair, Mark. You should also list this URL:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing#Criticism

It specifically mentions the studies you cite and tells of various problems
with them including clues and subjective validation.

I notice you also leave out later studies like the one done
in the '80s by Hyman and Alcock that find no legitimate
validation of any psi phenomenon!

Cheers,
Tanner
--
Tanner Lovelace
clubjuggler at gmail dot com
http://wtl.wayfarer.org/
(fieldless) In fess two roundels in pale, a billet fesswise and an
increscent, all sable.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page