Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-uk - Re: [Cc-uk] CC going mad?

cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Cc-uk mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Cory Doctorow <doctorow AT craphound.com>
  • To: "David M. Berry" <d.berry AT sussex.ac.uk>
  • Cc: cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Cc-uk] CC going mad?
  • Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:12:17 +0200

No, I'm saying that getting into the silly business of "How dare those people" (who are our allies, who work with us, whose goals we support 100 percent and vice-versa) "call themselves 'Free Culture Movement'" is sniping. There is zero substance to such a complaint. There's nothing wrong with the name "Free Culture Movement" for an org.

Wrt to CC: I'm saying that not enjoying someone else's gag isn't the same thing as having a substantive disagreement.

Wrt "over there." My postcode is in NW5. Where "over there" do you think I am?

Cory

On Jun 22, 2005, at 2:09 PM, David M. Berry wrote:


Cory

You seem to be saying 'let's have no dissent'. I would argue that we need a rich and critical discussion of all activities that Creative Commons gets itself into otherwise grave mistakes (like the Bzzz public relations fiasco) will be made. A lot of people invest a lot of time and personal work into supporting the Creative Commons, and when it starts to act completely authoritarian (like the Sampler License rename https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc- sampling/2004-August/thread.html ) or even plain dumb (like this), then it is important that it gets critical feedback from its supporters as well as its foes.

Maybe this 'joke' works better over there than over here. I don't know. But Creative Commons' actions I sometimes find plain conservative and reactionary rather than progressive. The dangers with Creative Commons, are their tacit acceptance of copyright (indeed their *need* for it) means that it can be used as an argument to support copyright extension rather than reject it. In other words 'copyright works, just look how CC makes the whole thing run smoother, who needs term limitations when stuff can be licensed anyway'. To read more of our critique see Free Software Magazine: http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/current_issues/#issue_05

Anyway, it's hardly a firing squad, and hardly in a circle, as clearly others agree with you and my remarks have generated lots of contrary debate - always a good thing.

;-)

Cheers

David



On 22 Jun 2005, at 10:27, Christian Ahlert wrote:

Is it really
necessary to arrange this firing squad in a circle?

Cory



--

Cory Doctorow
doctorow AT craphound.com

latest novel: craphound.com/someone

blog: boingboing.net
vanity: craphound.com
second novel: craphound.com/est
collection: craphound.com/place
novel: craphound.com/down
work: www.eff.org

Join my mailing list and find out about upcoming books, stories, articles and appearances:

http://www.ctyme.com/mailman/listinfo/doctorow





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page