On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:18:32 -0500 "Karl Randolph" <kwrandolph AT email.com>
writes:
> Peter:
>
> Taking the Greek listed below, it is interesting to note that the
> verb is singular, therefore it would not refer to TA APOKEIMENA
> which is plural, but to AUTWi. I don't know Greek that well, nor do
> I have an LXX handy, but could TA APOKEIMENA refer back to $B+ and
> MXQQ (the Hebrew words) that are the subjects of the first half of
> this verse?
>
> Similarly YB) in Hebrew is singular, looking for a singular
> subject.
>
> As for the AUTOS after the KAI, it looks as if it is merely
> linguistic, not theological.
>
> Karl W. Randolph.
_________________
Karl,
Nevertheless, TA APOKEIMENA is the subject of ELQHi. It is not at all
unusual for a NEUTER PL to take a sg verb.