XOM API for Processing XML with Java

[Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek AT lbl.gov>]

> > Also, what's your experience wrt. underlying Stax impls? e.g.  
> > Sun,  BEA, ...
> Don't use the BEAs (== the RI) as its slow, has weird bugs, and  
> things like creating an XMLStreamReader/Writer from a Source aren't  
> implemented. Haven't used Sun's. I *highly* recommend Woodstox  
> (http://woodstox.codehaus.org) as its fast (about 33% faster then  
> the RI from my non scientific tests), it works, and its very well  
> supported.

I have a pretty detailed performance testbench here. When your  
codebase has stabilized and is deemed reliable, I'll be happy to run  
it through, comparing it with a variety of other XOM or non-XOM  
models. No need to rush tough :-)

Wolfgang.