XOM API for Processing XML with Java

[Dan Diephouse <dan AT envoisolutions.com>]

Wolfgang Hoschek wrote:

> Interesting. I encourage you to take this further. For example, have  
> you plugged this into some kind of test driver? For example, take a  
> few thousand weird documents from all sorts of publicly downloadable  
> testsuites, run them through both your Stax Builder and the normal  
> XOM Builder, produce canonical XML from them, and compare results for  
> equality. See what happens...
Yes, I have tests in my local machine which runs them against a bunch of 
different documents. I don't compare it against the canonical xml 
though.  If someone wants to take this further right now, that would be 
great and I'd definitely want to work with them, but I'm not even using 
this code at the moment.

> Also, what's your experience wrt. underlying Stax impls? e.g. Sun,  
> BEA, ...
Don't use the BEAs (== the RI) as its slow, has weird bugs, and things 
like creating an XMLStreamReader/Writer from a Source aren't 
implemented. Haven't used Sun's. I *highly* recommend Woodstox 
(http://woodstox.codehaus.org) as its fast (about 33% faster then the RI 
from my non scientific tests), it works, and its very well supported.

> Wolfgang.
>
> On Aug 23, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>
> > Steve Loughran wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I'm trying to write a SOAP endpoint under ActiveSOAP, which has
> > > handlers for XmlBeans, Stax and XStream. Is there any binding between
> > > Xom and stax yet/planned?
> > I have some code here:
> >
> > http://codehaus.org/~dandiep/xomstax.zip
> >
> > - Dan
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions LLC
> > http://netzooid.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > XOM-interest mailing list
> > XOM-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/xom-interest


--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://netzooid.com