xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches
- From: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek AT lbl.gov>
- To: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek AT lbl.gov>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:05:58 -0700
3. revert Serializer.writeNamespaceDeclarations to previous impl (the
recently changed CVS impl shows a 25% degradation)
You could use an entrySet rather than a keySet to avoid get(prefix) lookups.
Iterator iterator = prefixes.keySet().iterator(); // WH should use entrySet()
...
Map.Entry entry = (Map.Entry) iter.next()
prefix = entry.getKey();
uri = entry.getValue();
It might help a bit but I haven't tried it.
Apart from this specific issue, in general, my impression is that this and many more namespace related issues might better be eliminated by solving the root problem: have a data structure and related methods in class Namespaces that are both more time efficient and *much* more space efficient. The current data structure is just a horrible mismatch for access patterns related to iterating over namespaces and namespaces-in-scope, in particular since Element.getPrefixesInScope() is not public. I realize it's not that straighforward to do it without breaking correct semantics, but it should nonetheless be doable.
[For example, it turns out I need Element.getPrefixesInScope() for some special cases arising in the XQuery Serializer. Now I can choose between three options, all of which unsatifactory: a) copy&paste it (licence problem), b) make the method public (incompatible), c) write my own impl. (horribly inefficient since it has no access to package protected methods).
Wolfgang.
-
[XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 07/19/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches,
Elliotte Harold, 07/21/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches, Wolfgang Hoschek, 07/21/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches,
Elliotte Harold, 07/21/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches, Wolfgang Hoschek, 07/21/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches, Wolfgang Hoschek, 07/21/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches,
Elliotte Harold, 07/21/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.