xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug
- From: Steve Loughran <steve.loughran AT gmail.com>
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:44:53 +0100
On Apr 7, 2005 11:01 PM, Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu> wrote:
> I have now turned off internal DTD subset building when parsing with
> Crimson and when there's an external DTD subset. It's an extreme
> solution but so far I haven't thought of anything better. :-(
abandoning crimson support ?
You can also set up gump to test against Crimson, as we do for ant,
even though crimson is not supported, some tests are explicitly
excluded (*) and all defects file against are WONTFIX:
http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/ant/test-ant-no-xerces/index.html
The purpose of that test is actually to make sure that there are no
xerces-only features creeping in, rather than verify that crimson
works properly.
On the subject of gump, Xom is failing:
http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/xom/xom/gump_work/build_xom_xom.html
Do you want/need some changes to your config there, to track what you
are up to in Jaxen?
-Steve
(*) Ant1.7 has a condition that checks the hosting XML parser for
functionality used to make sure there is no attempt to run
<schemavalidate> on crimson
<or>
<parsersupports
feature="http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema"/>
<parsersupports
feature="http://java.sun.com/xml/jaxp/properties/schemaSource"/>
</or>
-
[XOM-interest] Yet another crimson DTD bug,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 04/07/2005
-
[XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 04/07/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 04/07/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug,
Steve Loughran, 04/08/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 04/08/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug, Steve Loughran, 04/08/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 04/08/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 04/08/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug,
Steve Loughran, 04/08/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 04/07/2005
-
[XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 04/07/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 04/07/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [XOM-interest] Yet another crimson DTD bug, Wolfgang Hoschek, 04/07/2005
-
[XOM-interest] Re: Yet another crimson DTD bug,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 04/07/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.