xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: Elliotte Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- To: John Cowan <jcowan AT reutershealth.com>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:37:20 -0500
John Cowan wrote:
Actually, it doesn't. MUST merely means that it is non-conformant for
an xml:id processor to act otherwise. It does not imply, as it does
in the XML recommendation, that the document must be rejected.
OK. That's clearer.
Do we really want to reject documents on parse that do not satisfy the first two constraints? Maybe.
You have to report. It's up to you whether you want to refuse as well.
XOM really doesn't have a way to report other than refusing. I suspect I'm going to refuse.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo AT metalab.unc.edu
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
-
[XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id,
John Cowan, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id,
Elliotte Harold, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id,
John Cowan, 01/20/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id, Elliotte Harold, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id,
John Cowan, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id,
Elliotte Harold, 01/20/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id, John Cowan, 01/20/2005
- RE: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id, Michael Kay, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id,
Dirk Bergstrom, 01/20/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id, Adam Constabaris, 01/20/2005
- RE: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id, Michael Kay, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1 proposal: xml:id,
Elliotte Harold, 01/20/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.